Complex Integration: Is Path Dependent?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral ∫z* dz from the point (0,0) to (3,2) in the complex plane, specifically questioning whether this integral is path dependent.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of applying methods from real line integrals to complex integrals. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to start and considers parameterization techniques. Others suggest that a path must be chosen before proceeding with integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have proposed selecting specific paths for evaluation, such as a straight line and a piecewise path. There is acknowledgment of the integral's path dependence, with hints towards the relevance of the Cauchy integral theorem for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating in the complex plane and are considering the implications of path selection on the integral's value.

chill_factor
Messages
898
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Is the integral ∫z* dz from the point (0,0) to (3,2) on the complex plane path dependent?

Homework Equations



I = ∫ f(z)dz = ∫udx - vdy + i ∫ vdx + udy

z = x-iy, u = x, v = -y

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to start. The methods given in the book and from real line integrals don't seem to apply here. For example the book recommends, for real line integrals, to substitute y = x so that it reduces to a single integral. For complex integrals, it is recommended to parameterize f(z) into a f(z(t)) and reduce it to a single integration.

I've tried z = re^iθ, so dz = r*i*e^iθ dθ + e^iθ dr, now how do I reduce this to a single integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't reduce it to a integration with respect to some parameter t until you choose a path between the two points.
 
vela said:
You can't reduce it to a integration with respect to some parameter t until you choose a path between the two points.

Ok, thank you. I think now I figured the strategy out. Instead of trying to prove it in general that it depends on r, it could be better to select 2 arbitrary paths that are easy to compute: a straight line from 0,0 to the point, and the piecewise path of 2 line segments parallel to their respective axes.
 
In this case, that is sufficient: as you correctly guessed, the integral is path-dependent. You might want to wonder why this is the case. Cauchy integral theorem will be helpful here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K