1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Complex no & conjugate

  1. Apr 21, 2006 #1
    I would like to prove [itex]\mid z + \overline{z} \mid \leq 2 \mid z \mid[/itex]

    The first way I could think of:
    RHS^2 - LHS^2\\
    =4\mid z \mid^2 - \mid z + \overline{z} \mid ^ 2\\
    =4z\overline{z} - (z + \overline{z})(\overline{z}+z)\\
    =4z\overline{z} - z\overline{z}-z^2-\overline{z}^2-z\overline{z}\\
    \leq 0 ???

    I now know the correct proof is as follow:
    \mid z + \overline{z} \mid\\
    \leq \mid z \mid + \mid \overline{z} \mid\\
    = \mid z \mid + \mid z \mid\\
    = 2 \mid z \mid\\

    But what is wrong with my original proof?
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2006 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Nothing is wrong with it. what is z-z*? It's not a real number, is it.....
  4. Apr 21, 2006 #3
    okay got it..
    lets say b is Im(z).
    then b^2 is always positive, and (ib)^2 is always negative...

    you just got the signs wrong to start with.
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2006
  5. Apr 21, 2006 #4
    according to my proof, instead of [itex]\mid z + \overline{z} \mid \leq 2 \mid z \mid[/itex], it is [itex]\mid z + \overline{z} \mid \geq 2 \mid z \mid[/itex]...

    z is a complex no. and [itex]\overline{z}[/itex] is its conjugate. Have I mixed up some basic rules in complex no. with those in real no.?
  6. Apr 21, 2006 #5
    Sorry forgoth I haven't noticed your reply when i post mine... but I do not understand... do you mean that I cannot square a complex no?
  7. Apr 21, 2006 #6
    your last line had the wrong signs... or i just missed something.
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2006
  8. Apr 21, 2006 #7

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    When ever you do something like this, always step back and think: what happens in a simple example. For instance why not put z=i in and see what happens?

    But you are confusing some rules of real numbers with complex ones. Sure, if you square a real number it is positive, but the whole raison d'etre of complex number is that you have things that square to negative numbers.
  9. Apr 21, 2006 #8
    I see... thx~
    Too much used to real no... have never thought that there would be a problem on that line
    (never thought of posting a question in a forum could get immediate response too~ ^^)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Complex no & conjugate
  1. Complex conjugate (Replies: 1)