Why does the 'i' disappear in the simplification of a complex number sum?

AI Thread Summary
In the simplification of a complex number sum, the 'i' disappears because the modulus of a complex number is defined as the square root of the sum of the squares of its real and imaginary parts. Specifically, the expression |(cosθ - 1) + i sinθ| simplifies to √((cosθ - 1)² + sin²θ) by applying the formula for the absolute value of a complex number. The 'i' does not appear in the final expression because it is squared, resulting in a positive value. This process is based on the definition of the modulus, which states that |a + bi| = √(a² + b²). Understanding this definition clarifies the elimination of 'i' in the calculation.
RoughRoad
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
In a complex number sum, I have encountered a minute difficulty in understanding a step:

\left|(cos\theta-1)+i.sin\theta\right|
= \sqrt{}(cos\theta-1)^2+sin^2\theta


Now my question is, how did the 'i' got eliminated from the second step? Now, i equals \sqrt{}-1, so when squared, there should be a minus sign in the second step. Can anyone help me clearing my basics?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you remembering that the modulus of a complex number is the square root of the product of the number with its conjugate? That is:

\left | a \right | = \sqrt{\overline{a}a},

where

a =(\text{Re}(a)+i \, \text{Im}(a)),

\overline{a}=(\text{Re}(a)-i \, \text{Im}(a)),

and Re(a) is the real part of a, and Im(a) the imaginary part.
 
Thanks for the help! Simply ignored this basic rule initially.
 
The equality

|a+bi|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}

is just the definition of the absolute value! There is no reasoning behind it, it's just true by definition. Your OP was also true by definition.
 
As often happens, we have two identities, and whichever is taken as the definition, the other pops out as a theorem.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top