B Complex Number Solutions for |z+1| = |z+i| and |z| = 5

matrixone
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
This is a question from a competitive entrance exam ...I just want to check whether my approach is correct as i don't have the answer keys .

here is the question :

How many complex numbers z are there such that |z+ 1| = |z+i| and |z| = 5?
(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3

My approach :
let z = x+iy
Now, using |z+ 1| = |z+i|,
|(x+1)+iy| = |x+(y+1)i|
Simplifying this, i got x=y...(1)

and since |z| = 5 , we have √(x2+y2) = 5
which means (x2+y2) = 25 ...(2)

Now, plugging (1) in (2) , we get

x2 = (25/2)

therefore x can take 2 values similarly y also can take 2 values...
and since x=y in the complex number ...we have 2 solutions and hence the answer is 2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello m1, :welcome:

I would do it exactly the same way. Does that help ?
(An alternative, graphical approach is to draw a circle in the complex plane and pick the two points that have this property)
 
  • Like
Likes matrixone
BvU said:
Hello m1, :welcome:

I would do it exactly the same way. Does that help ?
(An alternative, graphical approach is to draw a circle in the complex plane and pick the two points that have this property)
Thank you sir ...but just a thought about your alternative ,
i would have to pick points in the circle centered at origin having radius 5 which are equidistant from (0,1) and (1,0) ...but doesn't that pursues the same algebraic calculations ? So its not an easier alternative in any sense right ?
 
matrixone said:
to pick points in the circle centered at origin having radius 5
for which a translation +1 on the real axis ends up at the same distance from the origin as a translation +1 on the imaginary axis
upload_2017-2-28_16-58-56.png

And yes, it's the same thing as what you do algebraically.
 
matrixone said:
Thank you sir ...but just a thought about your alternative ,
i would have to pick points in the circle centered at origin having radius 5 which are equidistant from (0,1) and (1,0) ...but doesn't that pursues the same algebraic calculations ? So its not an easier alternative in any sense right ?
Yes, except that the possible z solutions should be equidistant from -1 and -i. It's lucky that your answers are the same.
 
Following up on FactChecker's post, the number lies on the bisector, i.e., the line bisecting the segment from -1 to i , which is the x-axis. You can see that there are two solutions.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top