Complex powers/logarithmic spirals

  • Thread starter Thread starter hoodwink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between complex powers and logarithmic spirals, specifically the equation w^z = e^(z log w). It highlights that adding integer multiples of (2*pi*i) to log w corresponds to full rotations in the complex plane, leading to the multiplication of w^z by e^(z*2*pi*i). The significance of this representation as intersections of logarithmic spirals is explored, with one spiral being w^z and the other related to the added term. The conversation references Roger Penrose's "The Road to Reality" for further context. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the behavior of complex functions in the complex plane.
hoodwink
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When looking at

w^z = e^(z log w)

I understand that adding any integer multiple of (2*pi*i) to log w is equivalent to a full rotation in the complex plane. I don't understand how this step is equivalent to multiplying w^z by e^(z*2*pi*i). Also, I'm missing the significance of this being represented in the complex plane as the intersections of 2 logarithmic spirals. I can see how the first spiral is given by w^z, but the other?

If anyone has a copy handy, my questions arose from looking at pages 96-97 of The Road to Reality by Roger Penrose.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it is just rules of exponents from algebra.

(w^z)*e^(z*2*pi*i) = e^(z log w)*e^(z*2*pi*i) = e^(z log w + z*2*pi*i) =
e^(z(log w + 2*pi*i))

Does this help?
 
click! thanks for that diffy. hopefully those spirals will start to do the same now...:smile:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top