Complex Roots and the Pitfalls of Simplifying: A Closer Look at (-1-2i)^(1/3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter elfboy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the complex expression (-1-2i)^(1/3) and understanding the implications of simplifications involving complex roots. Participants are exploring the nuances of complex numbers, particularly in polar form, and the pitfalls of assuming identities that hold in real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss converting complex numbers to polar coordinates and the implications of multi-valued functions in complex analysis. There are questions about the validity of certain simplifications and identities when dealing with complex roots.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing various approaches and insights. Some express confusion over the multi-valued nature of complex roots, while others reflect on their lengthy attempts to find a solution. There is no explicit consensus, but several participants are engaging with the complexities of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of the principal value of complex roots and the challenges posed by the multi-valued nature of the expression. Some participants highlight the need for careful consideration of angles in polar coordinates, particularly regarding the arctangent function.

elfboy
Messages
92
Reaction score
1
evaluate the real part: (-1-2i)^(1/3)

and

show why (1-2i)^(1/3) is not equal to (-1)^(1/3)*(-1+2i)^(1/3)

you will be pulling your hair out
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know, I learned something today. My hair doesn't come out easily!

14 pages of working, and I hit a dead end
 
A. The real part is about 0.2 ? :)

B. Because multiplying by (-1)^(1/3) with turn the second complex number by 45 degrees and will not give you (different quarters) (1-2i)^(1/3).
 
Last edited:
For part a...

Well, converting this complex number to polar coordinates, we get

[tex]r = \sqrt{5}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = \arctan 2 - \pi[/tex]

and for the cube root we have

[tex]r = \sqrt[6]{5}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = \frac{\arctan 2 - \pi}{3}[/tex]

so the real part is

[tex]\Re z = r \cos \theta = \sqrt[6]{5} \cos \frac{\arctan 2 - \pi}{3} \approx 1.018[/tex]
 
[tex](1 - 2i)^\frac{1}{3} = \sqrt[6]{5} \left ( \cos \frac{-\arctan{2}}{3} + i \sin \frac{-\arctan{2}}{3}\right)[/tex]

by the same logic as above.

[tex](-1)^\frac{1}{3} (-1 + 2i)^\frac{1}{3} = \left(\frac{1}{2} + i \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right) \left(\sqrt[6]{5} \left ( \cos \frac{\arctan{2}}{3} + i \sin \frac{\arctan{2}}{3}\right) \approx -0.2013 + 1.292 i[/tex]

so those things aren't equal. It's not clear why they would be, since [itex]a^c b^c = (ab)^c[/itex] isn't an identity for the complex numbers.
 
elfboy said:
evaluate the real part: (-1-2i)^(1/3)

You made no mention of principal value so the real part is actually multi-valued:

[tex](-1-2i)^{1/3}=5^{1/6}e^{i/3(-\pi+\arctan(2)+2k\pi)},\quad k=0,1,2[/tex]
 
...
...
...
 
yup For part one, it's the minus pi part after the arctangent which is the part that tripped me up.
 
I am in the top 10 percentile of this teaser.

I definitely did not get it wrong.
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
I am in the top 10 percentile of this teaser.

I definitely did not get it wrong.

Yet more proof, as if any were needed, that you ARE Mr. Smartypants! The problem could be a little less trap inducing by pointing out, as jackmell did, that "^(1/3)" has to be defined. Otherwise, it's multivalued. I am curious what Mentallic spent 14 pages on. Trying to find a solution in radicals?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
I am curious what Mentallic spent 14 pages on. Trying to find a solution in radicals?

Converting into a+ib form.

More specifically, I assumed [tex]cos(x), sin(x)[/tex] where [tex]x=\frac{tan^{-1}2-\pi}{3}[/tex] wasn't a sufficient enough answer just as it wouldn't be sufficient to leave an answer as [tex]sin(cos^{-1}(1/2))[/tex] since it should be simplified.

This led me down a long and treacherous road... I thought I was going to finally get the answer in the end but it didn't seem like it was going to simplify the way I hoped. I do have an idea of how to solve it, but what I'm thinking of doing next will be the death of me. It'll require at least another 10 pages of working and simplifying :/
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Do I classify as 1/10 or 9/10 if I have not even attempted to solve (other than entering the expression into wolfram alpha)?
 
  • #13
Obviously the 1/10 else if you were in the 9/10 and then checked it, you would change your answer :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K