Complex Variables integration formulas

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around complex variable integration, specifically focusing on deriving integration formulas for a contour integral around a circle defined by the parametric representation of complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration of the function (1/(z-z.)) over a circular contour, with attempts to simplify the integral using specific values for z. and R. Questions arise about the validity of these simplifications and the implications of choosing arbitrary points.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the integration process, noting that simplifying the problem by setting z. to zero and R to one leads to a clearer understanding. There is an ongoing exploration of how these simplifications relate to the general case, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, aiming to prove the integration formula in a general context while grappling with notation and the implications of their assumptions.

MadCow999
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let C. denote the circle |z-z.|= R, taken counter clockwise. use the parametric representation z= z. + Re^(io) (-pi </= o </= pi) for C. to derive the following integration formulas:
integral C. (dz/(z-z.)) = 2ipi


Homework Equations


note: z. and C. represent z knot and c knot , and </= represents less than or equal to
and o represents theta

The Attempt at a Solution



i was able to do some work to it, but i eventually came out with (integral of) (R i e^io)/R which goes to integral of (i e ^(io))from -pi to pi, which comes out to e^(ipi) - e^(-ipi), which my teacher showed me comes out to zero. (i didnt quite understand his method, but i do know 0=/=2ipi
T_T
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a little hard to follow your notation. But for simplicity put 'z.'=0 and R=1. Then you are integrating (1/z)*dz where z=exp(i*theta). You are not integrating exp(i*theta)*d(theta) which it looks like you are doing. exp(i*pi)=(-1). exp(-i*pi)=(-1), so difference is zero. Your teacher was right about that.
 
Last edited:
hmm. so it seems to work if 'z.' = 0, but how can i say that? same goes for R = 1
is it because z. is just some arbitrary point i can pick?
we've done integral of (1/z)*dz, where z= R(exp(i*theta)) and dz = R*i(exp(i*theta))d(theta)
that comes out to be 2i*pi, but we were also doing over the interval of (0 to 2pi)

we're supposed to prove it in general i believe, so i would like to try and leave the z. and R in there.

i think I am seeing the relationship now...do i just say let z= z-z. and that yields the same (1/z) integral I've done before?

sorry bout sort of train of thought post...just trying to keep you updated with what I am doing :)
 
If you did it with z.=0 and R=1 I think you'll have no problems working it out in general. Yes, you'll get the same thing. You should notice the exponential part and the R just plain cancel. Welcome to PF.
 
okiedokie
thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K