Components of standing wave between harmonic frequencies

AI Thread Summary
For a wave fixed at both ends, the behavior of original and reflected waves between harmonic frequencies involves understanding superposition and cancellation at the boundaries. At non-resonant frequencies, the waves do not form a standing wave, leading to complex interactions where nodes and antinodes do not align perfectly with the ends. The original wave and its reflection will still interact, but the resulting wave pattern will be more complex and may not exhibit clear nodes and antinodes. Reflections occur at boundaries, and each reflection can further complicate the wave pattern. Understanding these interactions requires recognizing that every motion can be decomposed into frequency components based on the fundamental frequency.
ofeyrpf
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,
For a wave fixed at both ends, what is the behaviour of the original and refelcted wave between the harmonic frequencies?
I understand how a standing wave is created by the superposition of a wave and it;s reflection at a boundary. I also understand that at the fundamental frequency of the standing wave will be half a wavelength ( a node at each end and an antinode in the middle) and a full wavelength at double that frequency (with 3 nodes and 2 antinodes).
But what I can't figure out is what would the original and reflected waves look like between the resonant frequencies?
I know that at the ends they must cancel, so how does this effect the reflected wave?
Also is the reflected wave reflected again each time it meets a boundary?
Any help would be greatly appreciated?
An animation here clearly shows how the waves cancel at each end. But what about when the frequency is not right for a standing wave with nodes not at the ends exactly?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
thanks,
Shane
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what I can't figure out is what would the original and reflected waves look like between the resonant frequencies?
How do you define a frequency without a periodic signal?

Every periodic signal will have frequency components that are multiples of the fundamental frequency. Actually, you can split every possible motion into those components, and look at their evolution individually.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top