I Compositeness Limits -- Have We Reached Rock Bottom?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter lpetrich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Rock
lpetrich
Science Advisor
Messages
998
Reaction score
180
Particle Data Group - 2017 Review has some strong lower limits for the mass scales of possible quark and lepton compositeness, or at least the compositeness of the easier-to-study ones, like up and down quarks and also electrons. The limits are well into the TeV range, though they are somewhat model-dependent.

This means that electrons, up quarks, and down quarks do not start to disintegrate even after applying energies a million times their rest masses.

Here are the maximum ratios of disintegration energy to rest mass for entities previously discovered to have been composite:
  • Atoms: 10^(-8) (ionization of hydrogen atoms)
  • Nuclei: 10^(-3) (dissociation of deuterons)
  • Hadrons: 1 (deep inelastic scattering off of nucleons)
That makes it very difficult for Standard-Model elementary fermions to be composite: they are much less massive than their compositeness energy scales.

But there is a theoretical analogy: light mesons, like pions. Their mass is roughly sqrt(mq*mc) where mq is the quarks' average mass and mc = QCD energy scale. For mq << mc, m(meson) << mc also. So if the electron has a compositeness scale of about 1 TeV, then the electron's constituents would have to have masses around 1 eV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pions are special because they are goldstones. That means there is an inexact symmetry that is driving their masses near zero. (If the symmetry were exact, they would be massless)
 
  • Like
Likes arivero
Vanadium 50 said:
Pions are special because they are goldstones. That means there is an inexact symmetry that is driving their masses near zero. (If the symmetry were exact, they would be massless)
So in the scenario that I'd mentioned, the Standard Model's leptons and quarks are all pseudo-Goldstone particles, like the pion.
 
That's starting to sound like a personal theory. So far as I know, this is impossible without supersymmetry and virtually impossible with it.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
That's starting to sound like a personal theory. So far as I know, this is impossible without supersymmetry and virtually impossible with it.
Looks like that mechanism cannot work. So it'll be very hard for electrons and up and down quarks to be composite.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top