It is not intuitive, for me at least, why when relating the velocity of 3 inertial frames (Say F1, F2 moving at v1 with respect to F1, and F3 moving at v2 with respect to F2), one mulitplies the transforms of F2 and F3 to get the transform for F1 with respect to F3 to get v3. I understand why v3 does not equal v1+v2 and have seen some very understandable derivations of the velocity composition formula. But I have not been able to find the derivation of how mupltiplying two transforms leads to the third (and thus leads to v3).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thanks, Howard

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Composition of Lorentz Transformations

Loading...

Similar Threads - Composition Lorentz Transformations | Date |
---|---|

B How can I derive the law of composition of velocities? | Feb 10, 2018 |

B The velocity-composition law when c is in the picture | Jun 27, 2017 |

I Composite Galilean transformation in 2 dimensions | Apr 14, 2016 |

Composition of 2 transformations of E | Apr 4, 2015 |

Composition of Lorentz pure rotations | Apr 2, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**