Compound semiconductors in group IV

AI Thread Summary
Compound semiconductors in group IV, such as silicon, involve donor impurities from group V elements like arsenic and phosphorus, which replace silicon atoms in the crystal structure. Silicon has four valence electrons, while group V elements have five, leading to an extra electron when these impurities substitute for silicon. This surplus electron is contributed to the crystal structure, enhancing conductivity. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how these substitutions affect the electronic properties of the semiconductor. Clarifying these concepts is essential for grasping the behavior of compound semiconductors.
jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is an excerpt from a work

For example, in the case of compound semiconductors in group IV of the periodic table such as silicon, the main donor impurities are those which, being from group V of the period table (arsenic, phosphorous, etc), are substituted in place of a silicon atom in the crystal structure: since silicon is tetravalence, these atoms naturally form four covalent bonds with the silicon atoms around them, and also easily give up their surplus electron to the crystal structure.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



What I don't understand is the excerpt.

Okay, silicon is #14, which has 3s2 3p2, total of 4 valence electrons.
But I do not know

(1) first, which and where is this surplus electron referring to / from? from the substitution (group V), or four covalent-bonded silicon?

(2) second, so what about the substitution with an element of group V?

Any comment is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


A substitution from group V will have five valence electrons instead of four.
 


So it is from the substitution, since you can't fit the extra one.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top