Compression by spring, potential motion

AI Thread Summary
A proposed compressor design involves using a spring compressed by an electric actuator to generate air pressure for powering a motor generator. The discussion raises the question of whether this concept relates to "potential motion," with clarification needed on the terminology. It is noted that if "potential motion" refers to perpetual motion, the concept is not feasible and is prohibited in the forum due to the potential for nonsensical debates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to established scientific principles regarding energy and motion. Overall, the idea does not align with the laws of physics governing energy conservation.
wissy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Question I have, could a compressor that works by say a spring that gets pushed by a electric actuator into a compression chamber,, the actual power it takes to compress the spring only takes say 1 second, the spring then provides compressed air for let's say 5 seconds of powering let's say a motor generator, would this not be close to potential motion? the air could be hydraulic if better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what "potential motion" is. Did you mean Perpetual Motion? If so, no it would not, and perpetual motion threads are not allowed on PF at all, even to debunk. They typically lead to dozens of crackpots flooding it with nonsense and arguments are the only result.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top