A Compute Induced Metric on Kerr Event Horizon

Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

Suppose ## \Delta = r^2 + 2GMr + a^2## and ## \rho^2 = r^2 + a^2 \cos ^2 \theta ##. The Kerr metric is
$$
ds^2 = - (1 - \frac{2GMr}{\rho^2})dt^2 - \frac{4GMar\sin^2 \theta}{\rho^2} d t d \phi + \frac{\rho^2}{\Delta} dr^2 + \rho^2 d \theta^2 + \frac{\sin^2 \theta}{\rho^2} \left[ (r^2 + a^2)^2 - a^2 \Delta \sin^2 \theta \right] d \phi^2
$$

I want to determine the area of the inner horizon of the black hole. But first I need to determine the induced metric on the horizon. Suppose that the radius of the innermost horizon is ## r_*##. My tutor stated without proof that the induced metric was
$$
ds^2 = \rho_*^2 d \theta^2 + \frac{\sin ^2 \theta}{\rho_*^2} (r_*^2 + a^2) d \phi^2
$$
How do one compute this induced metric from the Kerr metric?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the horizon ##t## and ##r## are constants, so ##dt=0## and ##dr=0##.
 
martinbn said:
On the horizon ##t## and ##r## are constants, so ##dt=0## and ##dr=0##.

Also ##\Delta = 0## on the horizon.
 
That's right. Got it now. Thanks
 
Jonsson said:
Suppose ##\Delta = r^2 + 2GMr + a^2##

This isn't quite correct. It should be ##\Delta = r^2 - 2GMr + a^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes Jonsson
You're probably working through things yourself but if you want a check, the equation for the surface area of both the inner and outer horizon in Kerr metric is-
A_{\pm}=\pm4\pi\left(r^2_{\pm}+a^2\right)
where
r_{\pm}=M\pm\sqrt{M^2-a^2}
where \pm denotes the outer (+) and inner (-) horizon.

One source-
https://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_149222179481113&key=6afc78eea2339e9c047ab6748b0d37e7&libId=j1illvfl010009we000DApptnkylp&loc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Fthreads%2Fsecond-law-of-thermodynamics-and-the-macroscopic-world.833987%2F%23post-5238097&v=1&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F230923684_Entropy_of_Kerr-Newman_Black_Hole_Continuously_Goes_to_Zero_when_the_Hole_Changes_from_Nonextreme_Case_to_Extreme_Case&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Fsearch%2F5021084%2F%3Fq%3Dkerr%26o%3Drelevance%26c%5Buser%5D%5B0%5D%3D68677&title=Second%20law%20of%20thermodynamics%20and%20the%20macroscopic%20world%20%7C%20Physics%20Forums%20-%20The%20Fusion%20of%20Science%20and%20Community&txt=Negative%20Temperature%20of%20Inner%20Horizon%20and%20Planck%20Absolute%20Entropy%20of%20a%20Kerr-Newman%20Black%20Hole by Liu Bo Liu & Wen-Biao
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top