Computing harmonic oscillator propagator via path integral

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the harmonic oscillator propagator \( G(q_2, q_1; t) \) using path integrals, specifically the expression \( G(q_2, q_1; t) = \mathcal{N} \frac{e^{iS_{cl}}}{\sqrt{\det A}} \). The normalization factor \( \mathcal{N} \) is independent of \( q_1, q_2, t, \) and \( \omega \). Participants clarify the application of the identity involving the integral over a vector \( X \) and its connection to the path integral formulation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of defining limits and using known results to rewrite the propagator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of path integrals in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the harmonic oscillator model
  • Knowledge of self-adjoint operators in functional analysis
  • Experience with Feynman & Hibbs' techniques for quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the harmonic oscillator propagator from the free particle propagator
  • Learn about the discretization of path integrals and the limit process as \( N \to \infty \)
  • Explore the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the operator \( A = \frac{d^2}{dt^2} + \omega^2 \)
  • Investigate the normalization factors in path integral formulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on path integral formulations and the harmonic oscillator model. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of propagators and quantum field theory techniques.

naele
Messages
199
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that
[tex] G(q_2,q_1;t)=\mathcal{N}\frac{e^{iS_{lc}}}{\sqrt{\det A}}[/tex]
where [itex]\mathcal{N}[/itex] is a normalization factor independent of q1, q2, t, and w. Using the known case of w=0, write a formula for G such that there is no unknown normalization factor.

Homework Equations


I previously showed that
[tex] G(q_2,q_1;t)=e^{iS_{cl}/\hbar}\int \mathcal{D}xe^{iS[x]/\hbar} [/tex]

verified that [itex](x_1,x_2)=\int_0^Tx_1(t)x_2(t)dt[/itex] was a scalar product over the real vector space of trajectories x(t) and showed that [itex]S[x]=-\frac{m}{2}(x,A\cdot x)[/itex] where
[tex] A=\frac{d^2}{dt^2}+\omega^2[/tex]
and showed that A was self-adjoint. We're also given the following identity
[tex] \int\! dX\, e^{-\frac{1}{2}(X,A\cdot X)+(J,X)}=\frac{(2\pi)^{n/2}}{\sqrt{\det A}}e^{\frac{1}{2}(J,A^{-1}\cdot J)}[/tex]
where n is the dimension of the of the vector space.

The Attempt at a Solution


If I just blindly apply the identity that's given to us, I get confused about the exponent of the prefactor. I know that it should simply be a square root, but when I apply the identity (with J=0) I get N/2 ie
[tex] G(q_2,q_1;t)=\left(\frac{2\hbar\pi}{im}\right)^{N/2}\frac{e^{iS_{cl}}}{\sqrt{\det A}}[/tex]
I could collect all that into the normalization factor and get the desired expression anyway but that makes me a little uncomfortable.

As far as the 2nd part I'm not really sure if the problem is asking me to deduce the harmonic oscillator propagator from the free-particle or whatever. I'm confused because in the next question we're asked to find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of A, and then from there calculate G. At least that part seems really straightforward, especially using the Fourier series method from Feynman & Hibbs.

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that part of your confusion is that you can't just "blindly apply" the identity

[tex] \int\! dX\, e^{-\frac{1}{2}(X,A\cdot X)+(J,X)}=\frac{(2\pi)^{n/2}}{\sqrt{\det A}}e^{\frac{1}{2}(J,A^{-1}\cdot J)}[/tex]

This is an integral over a vector [tex]X[/tex] of scalars, whereas the propagator involves an integral over paths. You can make a connection between the two by defining a lattice, but then the normalization factor is only defined up to the limit in which the lattice spacing goes to zero and [tex]N\rightarrow\infty[/tex]. I believe the 2nd part of the problem involves either defining this limit or using some previously known result to rewrite it. I'm not sure what "known case" you've covered so far though.
 
Yea, I was thinking of doing something like this
[tex] \int\!\mathcal{D}x\, e^{iS[x]/\hbar}&=\lim_{N\to\infty} B^{(N-1)/2}\int\,\mathcal{D}x\,\exp \left[-\frac{m}{2i\epsilon\hbar}\sum_{i=0}^{N-1}[(x_{i+1}-x_i)^2-\epsilon^2\omega^2x_i^2] \right][/tex]
where B is an unknown prefactor to be determined. I can then introduce a a vector [itex]X=(x_1,\cdots,x_{N-1})[/itex]. The only problem I see is a discretized version of A, but I might just wave my hands over that. Then, if I apply the identity I can collect everything into one factor independent of everything.

As for the second part, the only other known case we've seen is the free particle. So I suppose if I naively introduce the same pre-factor instead of B like I have up there, and apply the same procedure I can get the harmonic oscillator result (but with undetermined det A).

Then the next question after that asks to determine the eigenvalues of A so getting the full expression should come right out, I hope.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K