Computing Wigner D-Matrices: Contradiction Found

  • Thread starter Thread starter sale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wigner
sale
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am writing a program for computing the Wigner d-matrices and ran into an apparent contradiction:

Specifically computing d^1/2_{-1/2,1/2}

According to Edmonds, p.59, 4.1.27 this is given by

(-1)**[1/2-(-1/2)][1!/(1! 0!)]**{1/2} sin(b/2)=-sin(b/2)

Now for d^{1/2}_{1/2,-1/2}
From p.61, (4.4.1) we get -sqrt(1) d^0_{00} sin (b/2)=-sin(b/2)

However, from the relation d^j_{m'm}=(-1)**(m-m') d^j_{m,m'}

these two should have the same sign as (m-m')=1/2-(-1/2)=1 is odd

Could be it a typo in Edmonds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible that there is a typo in Edmonds. However, it is also possible that the relation d^j_{m'm}=(-1)**(m-m') d^j_{m,m'} does not apply for the specific case you are considering. It may be worth double checking the equation and making sure that it is valid for the case you are looking at.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top