Concave mirror and virtual image

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an experiment involving a concave mirror with a focal length of 12.7 cm and a candle as the object. When the candle is placed between the vertex and the focus, a virtual image appears behind the mirror, with an object distance of 6.35 cm and an estimated image distance of -6.0 cm. The discrepancy in calculations using the mirror equation suggests potential measurement errors or misplacement of the object. The parallax method was employed to locate the image, which is often challenging for students.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of concave mirrors and their properties
  • Familiarity with the mirror equation
  • Knowledge of image formation and virtual images
  • Experience with the parallax method for measuring distances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mirror equation in detail, focusing on its application to concave mirrors
  • Learn about the principles of image formation in optics
  • Practice using the parallax method for accurate distance measurement
  • Explore common errors in optics experiments and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone conducting experiments with concave mirrors and image formation.

jnimagine
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
we used a concave mirror and a candle for an experiment
when the candle wa placed between the vertex and the focus of the mirror (f=12.7cm) a virtual image appeared behind the mirror.
We measure the image distance approximately by pointing a finger towards where the image might be and got 6.0cm (-6.0 when used in mirror equation) and the object was at 6.35cm. However, when I use the mirror equation to calculate the focus, i get a negative answer that is not even close to the actual focus 12.7cm. Do u think this is just due to human errors of not measuring the image distance accurately or is there some other factors that can account for this? OR is the image distance supposed to be almost the same as the object distance in this case?
 
Science news on Phys.org
For the given focal length (12.7) and object distance (6.35), you should get an image distance of -12.7.

So you must have either put the object in the wrong location, or else measured the image distance incorrectly. It sounds like you used the "parallax method" to locate the image. That is, you moved your finger around until you found a location where it appeared to line up with the image no matter what angle you looked at them from. I find that many students have trouble with this at first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 172 ·
6
Replies
172
Views
21K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K