Concave Spherical Mirrors: Object Position for Inverted and Enlarged Image?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the object position for a concave spherical mirror with a radius of curvature of 27.1 cm, specifically for the case where the resulting image is inverted and larger than the object by a factor of 4.00.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the mirror equation and the relationship between object distance, image distance, and magnification. There is confusion regarding the sign conventions for magnification and the application of the mirror equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different conventions for magnification and how they affect the calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of positive magnification and the implications of sign conventions. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the conventions used in optics, particularly regarding magnification and the mirror equation. There is an indication of differing conventions that may lead to confusion in solving the problem.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



A concave spherical mirror has a radius of curvature of magnitude 27.1 cm. Determine the object position for which the resulting image is inverted and larger than the object by a factor of 4.00.

Homework Equations



Mirror equation in terms of focal length: 1/p + 1/q = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not getting the correct answer for this question. Here's what I've done so far:

First we find the focal length

f=\frac{R}{2} \implies \frac{27.1}{2}=13.55 \ cm

M = \frac{-q}{p}=4 \implies q=-4p

Substituting in

\frac{1}{p} - \frac{1}{4p} = \frac{1}{13.55}

\frac{3}{4p} = \frac{1}{13.55} \implies p =10.162

I don't know why the answer is wrong. I know that image is inverted when Magnification is negative. Here it is not -ve because the questions says "larger" so I took it as positive...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:

Homework Statement



A concave spherical mirror has a radius of curvature of magnitude 27.1 cm.

Homework Equations



Mirror equation in terms of focal length: 1/p + 1/q = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not getting the correct answer for this question. Here's what I've done so far:

First we find the focal length

f=\frac{R}{2} \implies \frac{27.1}{2}=13.55 \ cm

M = \frac{-q}{p}=4 \implies q=-4p

Substituting in

\frac{1}{p} - \frac{1}{4p} = \frac{1}{13.55}

\frac{3}{4p} = \frac{1}{13.55} \implies p =10.162

I don't know why the answer is wrong. I know that image is inverted when Magnification is negative. Here it is not -ve because the questions says "larger" so I took it as positive...

What are you trying to find? You haven't said.
 
PeterO said:
What are you trying to find? You haven't said.

Oops. The question I was trying to ask was:

Determine the object position for which the resulting image is inverted and larger than the object by a factor of 4.00.
 
roam said:
Oops. The question I was trying to ask was:

Determine the object position for which the resulting image is inverted and larger than the object by a factor of 4.00.

You are having trouble with the minus signs.

There are two conventions out there one says magnification is -p/q the other says it is p/q

one of them has 1/p + 1/q = 1/r , the other has 1/p - 1/q = 1/r

make everything positive, and work on a positive magnification meaning inverted.
 
PeterO said:
You are having trouble with the minus signs.

There are two conventions out there one says magnification is -p/q the other says it is p/q

one of them has 1/p + 1/q = 1/r , the other has 1/p - 1/q = 1/r

make everything positive, and work on a positive magnification meaning inverted.

So, are you saying I should have used M=q/p so that q=4p? Because I am using the +ve equation 1/p+1/q=1/f.
 
roam said:
So, are you saying I should have used M=p/q?

Try it and see.
 
YES! It worked. Thanks for clarifying this, I REALLY appreciate all your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K