Concentrations of electrons in intrinsic semi-conductor

  • Thread starter Thread starter jendrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
AI Thread Summary
The formula for electron concentration in intrinsic semiconductors is expressed as n ∝ T^(3/2) exp(Eg/(2kBT)), indicating that n is proportional to the temperature and the exponential term. The discussion clarifies that "n" represents a density, which has units of m^-3, while the right-hand side of the equation has a different unit structure. The temperature dependence is highlighted as the effective density of states related to the conduction band edge. Understanding the proportional relationship is essential for accurate calculations in semiconductor physics. This clarification aids in applying the formula correctly in practical scenarios.
jendrix
Messages
120
Reaction score
4
Hi, I've just started using the formula for the abovie which is given as:

n t^3/2 exp(Eg/2kBT)

however instead of n= I think the sign is n is proportional, like this ∞

I was wondering which would be correct?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jendrix said:
Hi, I've just started using the formula for the abovie which is given as:

n t^3/2 exp(Eg/2kBT)

however instead of n= I think the sign is n is proportional, like this ∞

I was wondering which would be correct?

Thanks

Yes it's definitely proportional to, not equals. That is, n \propto T^{3/2} \exp(Eg/(2k_BT)).

You can "see" this easily enough by looking at the dimensions (units) of each side of the equation. The term "n" is a density, and therefore m^{-3} (or cm^{-3} etc), whereas the unit on the RHS is T^1.5.

The "T^(3/2)" factor is merely the temperature dependent part of the equation for the "effective density of states referred to the conduction band edge", if you want to google that.
 
Last edited:
I see now, thanks :)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top