Concentric coils for power generation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using concentric coils for power generation, specifically whether multiple coils of increasing size can enhance electricity generation. Participants concluded that due to the conservation of energy principle, adding nested coils does not yield significant improvements in efficiency, as many generators already operate at 98-99% efficiency. The induced current in the inner coil creates a back-flux that reduces the available magnetic flux for the outer coil, negating potential benefits. Thus, the concept of concentric coils for increased power generation is fundamentally flawed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with generator efficiency metrics
  • Knowledge of magnetic flux and back-flux effects
  • Basic concepts of electrical impedance in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electromagnetic induction in depth
  • Explore the efficiency metrics of various generator types
  • Investigate the effects of back-flux on coil configurations
  • Learn about impedance matching in electrical circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and anyone involved in the design and optimization of power generation systems will benefit from this discussion.

samstergurl
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Can nested coils be used for generation power from a magnetic field?
Most generators work by rotating a coil within a magnetic field. This induces a current in the coil and can be harnessed as electricity. I was wondering if it would be possible to generate more power by using more than one coil with each one being progressively larger wrapped around the others. I also know that the current induced in the coil creates a magnetic field that tries to oppose the change in the fields around it.

Does this prevent something like this from working or being useful? Or is there some other reason that this isn't done?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Nope. Conservation of energy is the dominant effect here. Many electric generators are already 98-99% efficient. The 1-2% losses are due to heating, friction and windage. And >100% efficiency is truly impossible. So there's not much room for improvement, no matter what you do on the electrical side.

It is so much easier evaluating ideas in terms of conservation of energy rather than thinking about amps, and volts, and flux density.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jrmichler, BvU and DaveE
samstergurl said:
Summary:: Can nested coils be used for generation power from a magnetic field?

I was wondering if it would be possible to generate more power by using more than one coil with each one being progressively larger wrapped around the others.
In addition to the overall energy considerations mentioned by @anorlunda the current induced in the inner coil generates a back-flux that lowers the available flux for the outer coil. If the two coils share the same radius, it's just like using a longer coil if you series connect them, or if you parallel connect the two coils you still get the same energy out but just at a different source impedance.

One way to see the flux-stealing effect is if you put a shorted turn around the same area as your pickup coil. The shorted turn kills almost all of the flux from the source, so your pickup coil picks up almost no energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda and DaveE
anorlunda said:
:welcome:

Nope. Conservation of energy is the dominant effect here. Many electric generators are already 98-99% efficient. The 1-2% losses are due to heating, friction and windage. And >100% efficiency is truly impossible. So there's not much room for improvement, no matter what you do on the electrical side.

It is so much easier evaluating ideas in terms of conservation of energy rather than thinking about amps, and volts, and flux density.
So you're already getting 99% of the energy out of that flux area, adding another coil inside of it doesn't improve that. Like how adding a smaller funnel inside of a bigger one doesn't increase the amount of water you get out in the end?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K