Concept of an area vector when finding magnetic flux

Click For Summary
Magnetic flux is defined using the formula Φ = BA cos θ, where θ is the angle between the area vector and the magnetic field. The area vector is normal to the loop's plane, allowing for a straightforward calculation of the magnetic field component that penetrates the area. Using cosine is appropriate because it accounts for the perpendicular component of the magnetic field relative to the area, while sine would require redefining the angle, complicating the relationship. The formula simplifies to BA when the magnetic field is perpendicular, confirming the use of cosine is correct. Thus, the definition of magnetic flux relies on the area vector to effectively represent the interaction between the magnetic field and the loop.
RobSoko315
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Concept of an "area vector" when finding magnetic flux

Hello,

I'm currently learning basic Electromagnetic Induction, specifically induced emf in a loop. According to my textbook, magnetic flux is defined as:
\Phi = BA cos \theta
Given that the field is uniform and is traveling through a constant area (the loop in this case).

The textbook then says \theta is defined as the angle between the area vector (A) and magnetic field (B). The book's only explanation of an area vector is "Its direction is normal to the loop's plane, and its magnitude is equal to the area of the loop."

My question is, why do we measure the angle with respect to the area vector, and not the plane of the loop? In other words, why do we say magnetic flux is defined as the above equation instead of:
\Phi = BA sin \theta ?
Where \theta is defined as the angle between the loop and the magnetic field.

Thanks in advance...

-Rob-
 
Physics news on Phys.org


We use cosine because in regards to magnetic flux, we only concentrate on the component of the magnetic field that is perpendicular to the plane of the area. The normal of the area (the line perpendicular to the plane) is used because it essentially is the simplest method to follow in basic or intro physics.

If we use sine, where theta is defined as you say, and the given angle is to the normal, then theta is the complementary angle to the given angle.
In general, we can use your method, but the definitions for magnetic flux follows the use of the normal line to the plane of the area.
 


Because flux through an area is the amount of field piercing the area. If the field were completely perpendicular to the area, then you would want the formula to be BA (you don't expect any correction for angle in this case, since the field is already piercing the area in the simplest way). The more general formula BAcos(theta) when the field is not perpendicular reduces to BAcos(0)=BA when the field is perpendicular, so that suggests that the cosine is indeed right.
 


Simply because \Phi = \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}

And the magnitude of the dot product is defined as ABcos\theta, where \theta is the angle between the two vectors.
 


Thanks for all you help

-Rob-
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
591
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
941
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K