Superposed_Cat said:
Thanks, why do we integrate on differential equations then?
I'll give an example where the "differential form" provides some guidance in setting up direct integrations to solve simple differential equations:
Suppose you have Hooke's law, F_spring = -kz, where z is the displacement. Then if there we ignore gravity Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma=m dv/dt, can be used along with Hooke's law to form a differential equation:
1) dv/dt = -k/m z.
Putting this into differential form gives:
2) dv = -k/m z dt
We can integrate the LHS, but the RHS is in terms of z and t, so we are stuck. Now go back the equation (1) and use the chain rule to modify the LHS:
3) dv/dt = dv/dz dz/dt, but dz/dt = v, the velocity, so we have:
4) v dv/dz = -k/m z, which in differential form is:
5) v dv = -k/m z dz; and in this form we can integrate both sides; the limits of integration for velocity must correspond to the limits for position - that is, the boundary conditions must correspond.
Assuming an initial velocity v0 at displacement z0, and current velocity v, position z we get:
6) 1/2 v^2 - 1/2 v0^2= -1/2 (k/m) z^2 + 1/2 (k/m) z0^2 or rearranging:
7) 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2 k z^2 = 1/2 mv0^2 + 1/2 k z0^2.
Equation (7) says that the sum of the kinetic and potential energy of the spring at any time is equal to the sum of the original values.
Note that the differentials which appeared in our expressions lead directly to the integrals.
This exercise shows the use of differentials as they were originally used in the Leibniz notation. In this case the differentials were "exact differentials", we could integrate them immediately.
Unfortunately most differential equations are not solvable by the method of direct integration, but this technique did give us the nomenclature. Most differential equations are expressed in the form of derivatives, but both notations are used.