Concept of Invertible Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter war485
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Matrices
AI Thread Summary
If A is an invertible square matrix, the equation Ax = b is consistent for every vector b in R^n, meaning there is always a solution x. The discussion clarifies that if A is invertible, one can find x using the equation x = A^(-1)b. Conversely, if A is not invertible, there may be no solutions or infinitely many solutions for Ax = b. The participants emphasize the importance of A's invertibility in determining the existence and uniqueness of solutions. Overall, the concept of invertible matrices is crucial for understanding the consistency of linear equations.
war485
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If A is an invertible square matrix, then Ax = b is consistent for each b in R^n

2. The attempt at a solution

If A multiplied by A inverse is identity, then it would always be consistent. So I thought , if A is just randomly multiplied by some x, then it will still be consistent right? I can't seem to find anything wrong with the statement above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not
 
cse63146 said:
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not

Ax=b is not exactly 'true' if there no solutions x to the equation given a b. If A is invertible then A^(-1)Ax=Ix=x=A^(-1)b. So given any b, x=A^(-1)b. Yes, it's consistent.
 
cse63146 said:
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not

I have no idea what you mean by this. What is "Ax= b" that it could "hold true"? Certainly if A is a matrix and x a vector with as many components as A has columns, then there exist a vector b such that Ax= b. Is that what you meant?

If A is invertible, then given any such vector b, there exist a vector x such that Ax= b.

If A is not invertible then, given b, there may not exist such an x or there may exist an infinite number of the them.
 
Thanks for the help guys. That little algebra helped me see it properly Dick.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top