Concept question about electric force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric force, specifically how a charged object, like a rubber comb, can attract uncharged bits of paper. Participants explore the mechanisms behind this attraction, including the role of charge movement and polarization in insulators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that a rubber comb can pick up uncharged paper bits, questioning the nature of the force involved.
  • Another participant explains that the comb becomes charged, causing charges in the paper to redistribute, leading to attraction.
  • A participant challenges the explanation by questioning how charges can move in an insulator like paper.
  • Another response suggests that electrons in the insulator can shift slightly, creating polarization that results in attraction.
  • A tutor shares a calculation regarding the electric force needed to lift a piece of paper, expressing uncertainty about the source of charge on the paper.
  • One suggestion proposes framing the problem in terms of the number of electrons that need to be moved to achieve a specific electrostatic attraction.
  • A participant expresses ongoing confusion about how uncharged paper can be attracted, despite the lack of electron transfer, and compares it to a Van de Graaff generator's effect on Styrofoam bits.
  • Another participant advises against thinking of the paper bits as gaining or losing electrons, instead suggesting that the polarization effect leads to a net attractive force due to the arrangement of charges.
  • It is mentioned that quantifying the force is more complex than applying Coulomb's law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of attraction between the comb and the paper bits, with some supporting the idea of polarization while others remain skeptical about charge movement in insulators. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the movement of charges in insulators and the complexity of quantifying the forces involved, indicating that assumptions about charge behavior may vary.

barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
If I comb my hair with a rubber comb, the comb can be used to pick up small bits of paper on a desk. This says that there is a force between the comb and the paper bits. If the paper bits are uncharged why are they attracted? You can pick up paper bits by pulling a piece of scotch tape frm a roll and using that also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The comb becomes charged. When you bring that near to an uncharged bit of paper the charges in the comb repel like charges in the paper to the far side of the paper and opposite charges are pulled to the near side.
 
This seems reasonable if the bits of paper were metallic. However, since the paper is an insulator how could the charges move??
 
barryj said:
This seems reasonable if the bits of paper were metallic. However, since the paper is an insulator how could the charges move??
Think of the electrons surrounding the nuclei of the molecules within the insulator as shifting to the side a bit, creating enough of a polarization charge to produce attraction.
 
The reason I was wondering about this is that, as a tutor, I wanted to show how electric force could exceed gravitational force and posed the question of how many columns would be required to be generated in a comb, rubbed through the hair, and lift a bit of paper off the ground at a distance of say 2 mm.I calculated that a bit of paper 1/8 inch square would have a weight of about 7E-5 N and then I went from here. The (q1)(q2) product came to about 3.4 E-21 giving the comb and the bit of paper a charge of about 5.8E-11 c. Then I asked myself where did the charge on the paper come from. I can visualize rubbing the comb might rub off electrons but did not know about the paper.

Maybe this is not a good problem to pose.
 
One way to pose the problem is: How many electrons would you have to move from object B to object A so that their electrostatic attraction is equal to the weight of object B. Then express that as a fraction of the total number of electrons.
 
I am still struggling with why a comb, or balloon would pick up uncharged paper bits because nothing has been done to the paper bits to add or subtract electrons. We could assume that the molecules and atoms could orientate themselves so as to be attracted but on the average, it seems to me this is hard to imagine. I can visualize the comb losing or gaining electrons due to the physical rubbing. I have a friend here that has a Van de Graph generator. He places a cup of Styrofoam bits on the upper terminal and when turned on, the bits all are repelled from the cup. This is a matter of repulsion not attraction but here again, the Styrofoam is an insulator and should not allow electrons to move. I'll keep thinking on the subject but yourt suggestion is a good one.
 
Look up "dielectric polarization".
For example here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric

The attraction is due to interaction of the induced dipole of the paper and the electric field of the charged rod. The expression of the force is not so simple as Coulomb's law.
 
barryj said:
I am still struggling with why a comb, or balloon would pick up uncharged paper bits because nothing has been done to the paper bits to add or subtract electrons. We could assume that the molecules and atoms could orientate themselves so as to be attracted but on the average, it seems to me this is hard to imagine. I can visualize the comb losing or gaining electrons due to the physical rubbing. I have a friend here that has a Van de Graph generator. He places a cup of Styrofoam bits on the upper terminal and when turned on, the bits all are repelled from the cup. This is a matter of repulsion not attraction but here again, the Styrofoam is an insulator and should not allow electrons to move. I'll keep thinking on the subject but yourt suggestion is a good one.
Do not think of the paper bits as gaining or losing electrons. They do not. Just think of the electrons of the paper shifting away a bit due to the negative charge of the comb. Once they have shifted, so that the paper becomes polarized, then the positive charges of the paper are slightly closer to the comb than the electrons are. Thus the attractive force on the positive charges is stronger than the repulsive force on the electrons. The net effect is an attractive force acting on the paper bits. As nasu says, to quantify the force is not so simple as the force between two charges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K