Conceptual Area Under Velocity-Time graph confusion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the area under a velocity-time graph, particularly regarding areas below the x-axis. It is clarified that areas below the x-axis can be treated as negative, leading to the conclusion that displacement is calculated as A-B, while total distance is A+B. Some participants argue that areas should always be considered positive or zero, while others emphasize the importance of sign in calculations. The conversation also touches on how computational methods might handle negative velocities, suggesting that they would account for the sign in displacement calculations. Overall, the consensus leans towards recognizing the significance of negative areas in determining displacement.
zabachi
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi all I have a confusion regarding a physics concept. When you consider area under graph (velocity time graph), if the area is below x axis, is the area considered to be negative?
For example, look at the attachment. There are 2 shaded areas. Let the area above x-axis be A and area below x-axis be B and ignore all the numerical values on the graph. Is the displacement A+B or A-B? I am very confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see your attachment but I can say that you can treat areas under the x-axis as negative (after all, the velocity IS negative, isn't it? - so a positive time times a negative velocity gives you a negative answer.). So A+(a negative)B is the total area.
Alternatively, and less strictly mathematically, you can just subtract the areas underneath from the areas on top. Same answer, of course.
 
The displacement is A-B, the distance is A+B.
 
MikeyW said:
The displacement is A-B, the distance is A+B.

Only if you neglect that areas below the x-axis are negative.
 
I don't agree, areas are always positive or zero.
 
MikeyW said:
I don't agree, areas are always positive or zero.

I guess it's only a matter of taste but x times y will be negative if y is negative, surely?

If you were using a computer to calculate displacement from a set of v,t coordinates, would you have a special routine to spot negative velocity sections and then 'subtract' them? I think you would, more likely, just add em all up with regard to the sign of the v.

Would you also think of having 'acceleration' and 'deceleration', rather than positive and negative acceleration? There is a direct parallel there.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K