Conceptual question about FBDs and KDs

  • Thread starter mbigras
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Conceptual
In summary: So you need to show both the accelerations of the center of mass, and the angular accelerations.In summary, the diagrams in examples 16.3 and 16.4 in Beer and Johnson's Vector Mechanics for Engineers illustrate how to draw forces on a free body diagram (FBD) and effective forces on a kinetic diagram (KD). The FBD shows all forces acting on a system, while the KD shows the accelerations of the system and is used to write the equations of motion. The difference between 16.3 and 16.4 is that in 16.3, the body is in fixed axis rotation and the center of mass cannot move, so only effective forces are shown. In 16.4,
  • #1
mbigras
61
2
I'm looking at example 16.3 and 16.4 in Beer and Johnson vector mechanics dynamics. It seems that you can draw the forces in your FBD as "effective forces" on your KD (kinetic diagram). I'm confused about how I should choose to draw the effective forces at the centroid G or to draw them where they are acting. In example 16.3 the forces are drawn where they are acting, but in 16.4 they are drawn at the centroid.

One hypothesis that I have is: if the body is in fixed axis rotation then draw the effective forces where they are acting but if the body is in general plane motion then draw the effective forces at the centroid.

Also I'm very interested to hear some helpful ways that you imagine going between drawing forces on a FBD and drawing the effective forces on the KD. I'm taking engineering classes as a physics major and this is my first exposure to effective forces and I'm having trouble understanding where the [itex]\bar{I}\vec{\alpha}[/itex] and the different effective force terms come from.

mechanics_questions.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't have the book, so I don't know how prescriptive it is about the "right" way to draw the diagrams.

The diagrams are just a (very useful) tool, to help you write the equations of motion, ##F = ma## and ##T = I\dot\omega##. The FBD shows what goes on left hand side of the equations. the KD shows what goes on the right hand side.

On the FBD, the simplest thing to do is draw all the forces at the points where they act.
On the KD, I would start by drawing the vectors that describe the acclerations of the system. For a rigid body, a simple way to do that is to show the translation and rotation of the center of mass. Then, multiply the accelerations by the corresponding mass or inertia values.

The diagrams 16.3 and 16.4 both follow those "rules".

If 16.3 the FBD is for the complete system, so it doesn't show the tensions in the two strings which are internal forces. But to write equations of motion, you might want to draw FBDs for the three parts A B and C separately, and then you do need to show the tensions. (But if you are going to solve the problem using energy methods, you won't need to do that.)
 
  • #3
thanks for the response. I was reading through the book section 16.7 on page 1048 addresses my confusion. AlephZero also said it. The key difference between 16.3 and 16.4 is that 16.3 is a "system of rigid bodies" with one member in fixed axis rotation which explains why we only see the couple and no effective force, and two members in translation which explains why we only see the effective forces but no couples. 16.4 is a "single rigid body" >>>>that is in general plane motion aka rotation and translation? Is this right?<<<<<< which explains why we see both an effective force and the couple.
 
  • #4
It isn't that 16.3 has several rigid bodies and 16.4 has only one.

The difference is that in 16.3 there is a constraint on how body C can move (the axle that supports it). Its center of mass can not move, so its displacement, velocity, and acceleration are all zero. But it can rotate about the axle, so it can have an non-zero angular acceleration.

If you were being pedantic, the masses A and B could have angular accelerations as well, except there are no forces that would make them rotate, so drawing an angular acceleration and then writing an equation that says it is 0 is rather pointless. Similarly, it is obvious that A and B will only move vertically, not horizontally.

In 16.4 the motion of the disk is not constrained in any way, so its center of mass can both translate in any direction, and also rotate.
 
  • #5


I would say that the choice of where to draw the effective forces on the KD depends on the specific problem and the type of motion being analyzed. In general, if the body is in fixed axis rotation, it may be more intuitive to draw the effective forces where they are acting. However, if the body is in general plane motion, it may be more useful to draw the effective forces at the centroid.

One helpful way to go between drawing forces on a FBD and drawing the effective forces on the KD is to think about the concept of moments. The effective forces on the KD represent the moments of the actual forces on the FBD, which can make it easier to visualize and analyze the motion of the body. Another helpful approach is to use the equations of motion, such as Newton's second law, to relate the forces on the FBD to the effective forces on the KD.

As for the terms \bar{I}\vec{\alpha} and the different effective force terms, these come from the equations of motion for a rigid body, which take into account the body's mass, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration. These terms represent the effects of the body's rotation on the effective forces, and their specific values depend on the geometry and motion of the body.

I understand that this may be your first exposure to effective forces, but with practice and a deeper understanding of the underlying principles and equations, it will become easier to interpret and use them in problem solving. I would recommend consulting with your instructor or a tutor for further clarification and practice with these concepts.
 

Related to Conceptual question about FBDs and KDs

1. What is the difference between a free body diagram (FBD) and a kinetic diagram (KD)?

A free body diagram is a visual representation of the forces acting on an object, while a kinetic diagram shows the motion of an object over time. FBDs are used to analyze static situations, while KDs are used to analyze dynamic situations.

2. How do free body diagrams and kinetic diagrams relate to Newton's Laws of Motion?

Both FBDs and KDs are based on Newton's Laws of Motion, which state that an object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force. FBDs and KDs help us visualize and analyze these forces.

3. Can you use a free body diagram to solve for unknown forces or accelerations?

Yes, free body diagrams can be used to solve for unknown forces or accelerations by applying Newton's Second Law, which states that the net force on an object is equal to its mass multiplied by its acceleration.

4. What are some common mistakes when creating a free body diagram or kinetic diagram?

Some common mistakes include forgetting to include all relevant forces, not labeling the forces correctly, and not drawing the diagrams to scale. It is also important to make sure the diagrams accurately represent the situation being analyzed.

5. Are free body diagrams and kinetic diagrams only used in physics?

No, free body diagrams and kinetic diagrams can be used in various fields such as engineering, biomechanics, and even in everyday life. They are useful tools for analyzing and understanding the forces at play in a given situation.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
534
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top