Conceptual question on field/displacement

  • Thread starter Thread starter johng23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electric field (E), displacement (D), and polarization in dielectrics. It highlights the confusion regarding how polarization, which seems to imply an opposing field, can result in a macroscopic field in the same direction. The equation D = εE is acknowledged, along with the inverse relationship E = κD, yet the conceptual understanding of displacement as an independent variable remains unclear. The resolution is suggested to involve considering the superposition of fields from numerous dipoles, where only the component parallel to the polarization survives. Ultimately, this approach clarifies the connection between polarization and the resultant macroscopic electric field.
johng23
Messages
292
Reaction score
1
I have a very basic problem in understanding the relationship between electric field and displacement. If a field is applied to a dielectric, it is clear that this will cause the material to polarize, and one can define the permittivity of the material to quantify the size of this effect. Since we can write D=\epsilon E, we can also define the inverse permittivity E=\kappa D. But conceptually, I can't make sense of the displacement as the independent variable. How does a polarization give rise to a macroscopic field in the same direction? If anything, a polarization seems associated with a field in the opposite direction (by imagining the situation in the center of a dipole), although I know that macroscopic E&M says nothing about these microscopic fields.

If I think about the case of stress and strain, I can easily imagine how either one gives rise to the other. Where is my problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, the answer is just to take the superposition of the fields from many dipoles. Everything should cancel except the field parallel to the polarization.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top