Conceptual work/energy question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inertialforce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two slides of the same height but different angles. It concludes that the horizontal distance from the edge of the slide remains unchanged when neglecting friction and air resistance. The reasoning is based on the conservation of energy principle, where the change in potential energy equals the change in kinetic energy. Since the height remains constant, the angle of the slide does not affect the overall energy conversion. Thus, the steeper slide does not alter the horizontal distance traveled.
Inertialforce
Messages
67
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Person A is seen going down a slide with height "h". A few seconds later the same person A is seen going down a steeper slide with the same height "h" (same height for both slides). Using principles of physics, explain how the new horizontal distance from the edge of the slide compares with the first situation. Friction and air resistance are negligible.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The conclusion I came to was:

With the new horizontal distance from the edge of the slide, nothing would change because if you neglect the effects of friction and air resistance then that means that you neglect all non-conservative forces and the work done by it. Therefore without any non-conservative forces to effect the system, the change in potential energy would therefore equal the change in kinetic energy (or ΔEp = ΔEk). To sum it up, the steeper slide makes no difference because the only thing that has changed is the angle of the slide.

Would this be correct?
 
  • Like
Likes Neha Siddhartha
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct.
 
Remember since h remains the same. Ep and Ek are related by v = \sqrt{2gh}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top