Condensed Matter Physics - Fermi velocity, etc.

Graham87
Messages
72
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
See pic
Relevant Equations
See pic
1.png

I have made solutions a-d, but my fermi velocity seems too big.
ABFADD74-441B-4438-8095-DCFAAD139804.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you used Ef= 5 J?
Remember, it's Ef= 5 eV.
 
Gordianus said:
Have you used Ef= 5 J?
Remember, it's Ef= 5 eV.
Thanks! I realized that later. When I converted eV to joule I got the right Fermi velocity.

However, how may I got mean electron speed?
I know that most of the electrons are not on the Fermi surface, and I need to find the mean speed of all electrons.
 
Do you know something about the density of states function g(E)?
 
Gordianus said:
Do you know something about the density of states function g(E)?
We know that density of states in 2D is (L/2pi)^2 ?
So DOS is the no of electrons per unit area? So I just have to multiply DOS with unit area to find the total electrons?
But I will need the velocity of the total electrons?
 
Last edited:
I think I solved most of my problem now.

However I’m not 100% sure about mean speed in a). I used the formula and plugged in Fermi energy there, but might there be another E that should be there instead?

Thanks
059878F8-1C94-401B-8580-BB02F262015A.jpeg
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top