Condition of a vector field F being conservative is curl F = 0,

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which a vector field F is considered conservative, specifically focusing on the relationship between the curl of F and its dependence on spatial or other variables. Participants explore examples and counterexamples, questioning the implications of curl F = 0 in various contexts, including constant fields and time-dependent fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether curl F = 0 implies that F is a function of position r, seeking examples where this is not the case.
  • One participant provides a constant vector field as an example where curl F = 0, suggesting that it does not meet the criteria for being conservative.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of F being a function of velocity v (v = dr/dt) and questions if curl F = 0 implies conservativeness in this context.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumption that zero curl necessarily indicates a conservative field, particularly in the context of velocity/time-dependent fields.
  • One participant notes that a vector field can be expressed as a gradient of a scalar function if curl F = 0, but emphasizes that this does not imply conservativeness in all cases.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of having a family of vector fields parameterized by additional variables, suggesting that the zero curl condition still holds under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the implications of curl F = 0, particularly in relation to whether it guarantees that the vector field is conservative. Multiple competing views remain on the interpretation of this condition in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of the simply connected nature of the domain when discussing the relationship between curl and conservativeness. There are also mentions of the complexities introduced by time-dependent or velocity-dependent fields.

Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
When we say condition of a vector field F being conservative is curl F=0,does it mean that F=F(r)?.I know normally it does not look so.Please,then site an example where F is not a function of r,but still curl F=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By "curl of F=0" we mean

\nabla_{\vec{r}} \times \vec{F}=0

for an \vec{F}=\vec{F}\left(\vec{r}\right)

If \vec{F}\neq \vec{F}\left(\vec{r}\right) then

\nabla_{\vec{r}} \times \vec{F}\equiv 0
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
When we say condition of a vector field F being conservative is curl F=0,does it mean that F=F(r)?.I know normally it does not look so.Please,then site an example where F is not a function of r,but still curl F=0.

One example: A constant vector field \vec F(x\hat x + y\hat y + z\hat z) = a\hat x + b\hat y + c\hat z has no curl.

The curl of a gradient is necessarily zero:
\vec F(\vec x) = \nabla \phi(\vec x)

So all you need to do is come up with a scalar function \phi(\vec x) that cannot be expressed as a function of ||\vec x||.

The constant vector field corresponds to \phi(\vec x) = ax + by + cz, where \vec x = x\hat x + y\hat y + z\hat z. Then \nabla \phi(\vec x) = a\hat x + b\hat y + c\hat z.
 
Last edited:
I thank you both.And I was not interested about constant fields.
However,What about F=F(v) where v=dr/dt
And also if curl F=0 where F=F(t),or,F=F(v) does it mean the field is conservative?
 
A picked a constant vector field as a simple counterexample. Any vector field that can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar function has zero curl.

For the latter, \vec F = \vec F(\vec v), \vec v = d\vec r/dt, the curl is zero since the partials of \vec F with respect to components of \vec r are zero. Drag in a constant density fluid satisfies these conditions, and is definitely not conservative.
 
D H said:
A picked a constant vector field as a simple counterexample. Any vector field that can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar function has zero curl.

For the latter, \vec F = \vec F(\vec v), \vec v = d\vec r/dt, the curl is zero since the partials of \vec F with respect to components of \vec r are zero. Drag in a constant density fluid satisfies these conditions, and is definitely not conservative.

Unless you're talking about a viscous fluid and \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}(\mathbf{r}, t) is the velocity field. But then things are still more complicated.

Generally velocity/time dependent forcing fields are not conservative. I really dislike it when classes take the perspective that if the curl is zero, then it has to be conservative.
 
DH:If F=F(v) has curl F=0,then what do you mean by this?
Drag in a constant density fluid satisfies these conditions, and is definitely not conservative.
StatMechGuy:I really did not understand:
I really dislike it when classes take the perspective that if the curl is zero, then it has to be conservative
 
StatMechGuy said:
Generally velocity/time dependent forcing fields are not conservative. I really dislike it when classes take the perspective that if the curl is zero, then it has to be conservative.

I agree. A zero curl simply means the field is irrotational, period.
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
When we say condition of a vector field F being conservative is curl F=0,does it mean that F=F(r)?.I know normally it does not look so.Please,then site an example where F is not a function of r,but still curl F=0.


A vector field assigns a vector to each point of the "base space": it is a mapping v(p) from the base space M into a vector space V. In the settings where curl and so on make sense, it can be shown that, if curl_p v = 0 over M, AND IF M IS SIMPLY CONNECTED (no "holes"), that there exists a scalar function f(p) over M, such that v(p) = grad f.

Now, nothing stops you from adding extra parameters to this problem. That is, if you consider a "vector field" which is in fact a *family* of vector fields:
v(p,lambda), with p in M, but lambda any other (set of) parameters, such as time or whatever, well the same theorem holds, for each individual member (indicated by lambda) of the family: if curl_p v(p,lambda) = 0 then v(p,lambda) = grad_p f(p,lambda).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K