Conditional Dependent Probability

lilcoley23@ho
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
My questions I am looking at is:

We have twelve balls, four of which are white and eight are black. Three blindfolded players, A, B, and C draw a ball in turn, first A, then B, then C. The winner is the one who first draws a white ball. Assuming that each black ball is replaced after being drawn, find the ratio of the chances of each player.

I do not have any background on dependent proability with replacement, only without.

When making a probability tree with replacement would it look like this:

...PlayerA....Player B...Player C
...- ......- ......-
...- - - ...... - - -......- - -
...- - - -......- - - - ....- - - -
...b...w......b...w...b...w
...8/12...4/12....8/13...4/13...8/14...4/14

Please ignore the dots, it's the only way I could get my probability tree to look right.

My logic is that player A has an advantage because he's going first. So to reduce player 2's chances I added one to the sample set to symbolize that a turn had already been taken. Am I right in my thinking?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first round, A has a P of 1/3, B has a P of (2/3)1/3, while C has a P of (2/3)21/3. For each subsequent round, the ratio of their chances are the same. Thus their probabilities remain in the ratio 9:6:4.
So P(A)=9/19, P(B)=6/19, P(C)=4/19.
 
Thank you so much! That makes so much more sense then what I was trying to do! Is there a way for me to rate your response as AWESOME!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top