Conditional Probabilities Complementary Proof

rbzima
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble seeing how this works out. It's blatantly obvious that this is true, but somehow I can't seem to get anywhere on paper with it to simplify it down to anything. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

P\left(A\right|B)=1-P\left(not A\right|B)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
P(A|B) = P(A&B)/P(B)
P(~A|B) = P(~A&B)/P(B)

What is P(A&B) + P(~A&B) = ?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top