Conditions necessary for emission of EMR

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the necessary conditions for the emission of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Key points include the requirement of electromagnetic waves, such as light and radio waves, and the role of electric and magnetic fields (EMF) in this process. There is also mention of potential health effects associated with EMR, particularly concerns about its link to cancer, although no definitive proof exists. The participant expresses initial confusion but gains clarity on the topic. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding EMR and its implications.
desormais
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sorry if this is the wrong place, I'm new here but I've been given a little paper to write on electromagnetic radiation. I am having trouble finding what the necessary conditions are for the emission of EMR, and kind of don't understand what it's really asking me for.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
desormais said:

Homework Statement



Sorry if this is the wrong place, I'm new here but I've been given a little paper to write on electromagnetic radiation. I am having trouble finding what the necessary conditions are for the emission of EMR, and kind of don't understand what it's really asking me for.

thanks in advance.
You need an electromagnetic wave...light, radio waves, microwaves, gamma rays, etc,. and ,in particular , electricity, where the term EMF (electric and magnetic fields) is more commonly used than the term EMR (electromagnetic radiation). Are you being asked to write about EMR and its possible health effects on humans? I'm just guessing, it cause some concern awhile back about causing certain cancers (also cell phone EMR was a concern), none of which has ever been proven, There's probably tons of literature available ..try a Google search.
 
ok, thanks. I understand the question now.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Cause of spontaneous emission?
Replies
15
Views
4K
Teaching about electromagnetic radiation & struggling
Replies
39
Views
7K
Radiation of a Spherical Body Inside a Black Body
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why do Christmas lights glow green near a Tesla coil?
Replies
9
Views
2K
How come accelerating charges produce EMR, but others don't?
Replies
5
Views
3K
How can I chemically regenerate my car's catalytic converter?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Why is the condition E << m valid for Carbon 12 ions in nonrelativistic physics?
Replies
9
Views
1K
Electromagnetic emission lines for a hydrogen atom
Replies
4
Views
1K
Heat Loss Experiment: Explaining Results with Ideas
Replies
9
Views
4K
How does thermionic emission work?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top