Conditions on Complex Inequality

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding constraints on real numbers a, b, and c such that a given complex inequality holds for all complex numbers w1, w2, and w3. The conditions involve ensuring that a specific expression remains non-negative and that it equals zero only when all complex variables are zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the conditions on the variables a, b, and c, questioning whether certain bounds are necessary. There is discussion about the possibility of some terms being negative while still satisfying the overall non-negativity of the expression.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the constraints and exploring different interpretations of the conditions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the positivity of terms involving a and b, while others are questioning the necessity of bounds on c. There is no explicit consensus on the strongest constraints yet.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the conditions needing to be satisfied simultaneously and how they relate to the values of the complex variables. Participants are also considering the impact of allowing certain terms to be negative under specific conditions.

Shoelace Thm.
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find constraints on a,b,c \in \mathbb{R} such that \forall w_1,w_2,w_3 \in \mathbb{C},

(1) x = |w_1|^2(1-c) + a|w_2|^2 + c|w_1+w_3|^2 + |w_3|^2(b-c) \ge 0 and

(2) x=0 \Rightarrow w_1=w_2=w_3=0.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I believe the solution is a>0, c = \mathbb{R_{+}} \setminus \{1\}, b>c, but I am not sure if there are stronger bounds. How can I know for sure?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have made sure that each term is not negative - which certainly guarantees the sum is not negative. Though note: c ≤ 1 means that (1 - c) ≥ 0 doesn't it so do you need the lower bound on c?

Is it possible for some terms to be negative and still end up with x not negative?
i.e. if you allow the constraints on a,b,c, to depend on the |wi| etc. (where i is in {1,2,3}.)

Though I'm guessing that conditions (1) and (2) have to be satisfied simultaneously ... i.e. need to see your reasoning.

note: ##w_1=w_2=w_3=0## certainly means the ##x=0## no matter what a,b,c are. But that's not what condition (2) says is it?
 
Last edited:
Well as you note I chose a and b so that the terms involving them are positive. c can be any positive real except 1. It can be positive and less than 1 obviously. It can't equal 1 because then w_1 can be any complex number. It can be greater than 1 because the sum of the first and third terms of x are then positive. If c is not bounded below by 0, then for large w_3, the sum of the first and third terms of x are negative.

As to your note, no, that's not what condition (2) says.
 
OK - if every term has to be, individually, non-negative (and that "for all" kinda suggests this) then I don't see tighter constraints. There is this feeling there is something left out isn't there - but that's the only thing that springs to my mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K