Conductor inside capacitor check

AI Thread Summary
An isolated conductor of thickness 'a' placed between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor divides the capacitor into two capacitors in series, each with a higher capacitance. The initial calculations for capacitance yield C1 and C2 based on the modified distance (d-a)/2. The discussion highlights a difference in capacitance equations, with one participant using a CGS unit approach while another refers to the SI unit form. As the conductor's thickness approaches zero, the capacitance approaches the original formula, confirming the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding different capacitance equations and their implications in physics.
nissanztt90
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An isolated conductor of thickness 'a' is placed between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor. Find the capacitance

Homework Equations



C = A/(4*pi*d)


The Attempt at a Solution



C1 = A/(4*pi*((d-a)/2))
C2 = A/(4*pi*((d-a)/2))

1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2

Plugging in C1 and C2...

1/C = (8*pi*((d-a)/2)) / A

or

C = A / (8*pi*((d-a)/2)

If I am understanding this correctly...the conductor divides the capacitor into two capacitors in series...if someone can confirm this i appreciate it. TIA.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nissanztt90 said:

Homework Statement



An isolated conductor of thickness 'a' is placed between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor. Find the capacitance

Homework Equations



C = A/(4*pi*d)


The Attempt at a Solution



C1 = A/(4*pi*((d-a)/2))
C2 = A/(4*pi*((d-a)/2))

1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2

Plugging in C1 and C2...

1/C = (8*pi*((d-a)/2)) / A

or

C = A / (8*pi*((d-a)/2)

If I am understanding this correctly...the conductor divides the capacitor into two capacitors in series...if someone can confirm this i appreciate it. TIA.

Yes, it does divide it into two capacitors in series, each with a higher capacitance. If the dividing conductor is infinitely thin, then the change in capacitance should be what?

BTW, I'm not familiar with the capacitance equation you are using. Is it the form that is used in advanced physics units? The engineering form that I'm used to is:

C = \frac{\epsilon A}{d}

for a large thin capacitor (so edge fringe effects are negligible).
 
The form i am using is just in CGS units...where the SI form is just divided by epsilon*4*pi I believe so that k = 1.

As the conductor thickness goes to 0, (d-a) will go to d, and the division by 2 will be negated by the factor of 8 as opposed to 4...so it will go back to the original equation.
 
Thanks for the note about the cgs approach -- I was thinking that was the difference. And you are correct on the limit -- makes sense after all. It's a good way to check your equations, but it looks like you already knew that.
 
Yes i did...thanks again for the check.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top