Conductors in Electrostatic Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field around a long straight metal rod with a specific charge per unit length. The use of the equation ## \int E\cdot dA = \dfrac{q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0}## is justified because the rod is treated as infinite, allowing for a closed Gaussian surface around it. When considering points inside the rod, a Gaussian cylinder with radius x can be constructed, and the electric field E can be factored out of the integral since it remains constant. The area A for the cylindrical surface is simplified to ##2\pi x l##, ignoring the end caps due to the rod's infinite length. This approach clarifies the application of Gauss's law in this scenario.
oneplusone
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
A long straight metal rod has a radius of 5 cm and a charge per unit length of 30 nC/m. Find the electric field x cm away where distance is perpendicular to the rod.The solution to this uses ## \int E\cdot dA = \dfrac{q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0}##. My question is, why can you use this? I thought that is only when the gaussian surface is closed.

I understand the rest of the solution, but this theoretical part is confusing me…

thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My first thought; The rod is "long" which is a buzz word for infinite. An infinite road is enclosed by an area, the area of the gaussian cylinder that surrounds it. There are no endcaps because the rod is infinite so the area is closed.
 
Hmmm, so suppose that x < 5 (find field inside rod)…
does that mean you construct a gaussian cylinder that has radius x? And then use the equation above?

And since it is infinite, am I correct in saying that we can pull ##E## out of the integral (it is constant), and ##A## would just be ##2\pi x l## (we can ignore the "caps" of the cylinder since it's infinite?)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top