Conductors in Electrostatic Equilibrium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field around a long straight metal rod with a radius of 5 cm and a charge density of 30 nC/m. The key equation used is Gauss's law, expressed as ## \int E\cdot dA = \dfrac{q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0}##, which is applicable due to the rod's infinite length. Participants clarify that for points inside the rod, a Gaussian cylinder with radius x can be constructed, allowing the electric field E to be treated as constant, simplifying the integral to ##E \cdot 2\pi x l##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts
  • Knowledge of cylindrical symmetry in charge distributions
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric fields generated by various charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their properties
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields inside conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields around charged conductors.

oneplusone
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
A long straight metal rod has a radius of 5 cm and a charge per unit length of 30 nC/m. Find the electric field x cm away where distance is perpendicular to the rod.The solution to this uses ## \int E\cdot dA = \dfrac{q_{encl}}{\epsilon_0}##. My question is, why can you use this? I thought that is only when the gaussian surface is closed.

I understand the rest of the solution, but this theoretical part is confusing me…

thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My first thought; The rod is "long" which is a buzz word for infinite. An infinite road is enclosed by an area, the area of the gaussian cylinder that surrounds it. There are no endcaps because the rod is infinite so the area is closed.
 
Hmmm, so suppose that x < 5 (find field inside rod)…
does that mean you construct a gaussian cylinder that has radius x? And then use the equation above?

And since it is infinite, am I correct in saying that we can pull ##E## out of the integral (it is constant), and ##A## would just be ##2\pi x l## (we can ignore the "caps" of the cylinder since it's infinite?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K