I Confidence Intervals for Proportions, n<30

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,678
Reaction score
12,352
Hi All,
I am having trouble finding a good ref. for finding confidence intervals for population proportions
for small sample sizes; n<30. I have seen suggestions to use simulations, t-distributions, etc. .
Any ref. , please?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No refs I'm afraid, but what about using the binomial distribution?

To get a ##\alpha##-quantile one-sided upper-tail confidence interval for the proportion of a population with property X when we have observed k data with the property in a sample of n, we could solve for ##p## the equation:

$$B^p_n(k-1)=1-\alpha$$

where ##B^p_n## is the cdf of a binomial distribution with parameters ##p,n##.

Then, if the population proportion with property X is ##p##, the probability of observing ##k## or more data with the property in a sample of size ##n## is ##\alpha##.

This is just trying to follow the same logic that I think I recall is used to set conf interval limits for larger samples, where a normal approximation can be used for the distribution of the proportion in the sample.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Thanks,this works, I was thinking something along this lines but the person who asked me just wanted refs.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top