Confused about energy in a system (Understanding)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter qazxsw11111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Energy System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy dynamics of a ball falling onto a spring, specifically focusing on the energy transfer and storage in the spring during compression. Participants explore concepts related to kinetic energy, potential energy, work done on the spring, and the average force exerted by the spring. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and clarification of energy equations in the context of mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the total energy lost by the ball is equal to the energy absorbed by the spring, expressed as 1/2 mv² + mgx.
  • Others clarify that the energy stored in the spring when compressed is related to the average force exerted, suggesting that the relationship for work done on the spring is Work = F x X.
  • A participant questions the interpretation of energy equations, specifically the inclusion of the factor of 1/2 in the spring energy equation, proposing that it should be linked to the average force and distance compressed.
  • Some participants mention the mean value theorem and suggest calculating the average force as F_avg = (Ff - Fi)/2, while others emphasize the need to express energy in terms of the spring constant.
  • There is a discussion about the conservation of energy, with some participants stating that the potential energy and kinetic energy lost by the ball should equal the energy stored in the spring.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the origin of the 1/2 factor in the spring energy equation and seeks clarification for coursework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of energy equations related to the spring and the ball. Multiple competing views remain regarding the correct application of work, energy, and the role of the average force.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the system, the definitions of work and energy, and the mathematical steps involved in deriving the relationships presented. Some participants express uncertainty about the correct application of energy conservation principles.

qazxsw11111
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Take for example, a ball falling on a spring. Before touching the spring, the ball has velocity v. Then x metres of spring is compressed.

Total energy that is lost in the spring=1/2 mv2+mgx

When the spring is compressed for x m, it has 1/2 (F) (x) J of energy, right?

So to find the average F exerted by spring, should I combine the two equations together to find f?

However, my teacher said that the first equation should be linked to Fx as work is done by the ball. Thats another way of looking at it though, but the answer is different obviously. How do you explain it? I know it is my misunderstanding, can anyone help me see the light?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Total energy that is lost in the spring=1/2 mv2+mgx

This would be the total energy absorbed by the spring, not lost.

When the spring is compressed for x m, it has 1/2 (F) (x) J of energy, right?

No, I don't think so. If you take away the 1/2 then that will be the relationship for work done on the spring. In other words,

Work = F x X

But work is not the same as energy, do you know the difference?

So to find the average F exerted by spring, should I combine the two equations together to find f?

Combine which two equations? Ideally, you would find the average force by applying the mean value theorem on F = -kx. But since this is a simple and ideal problem you could just find the total change in force on the spring and divide by 2. Or,

Favg = (Ff-Fi)/2

However, my teacher said that the first equation should be linked to Fx as work is done by the ball. Thats another way of looking at it though, but the answer is different obviously. How do you explain it? I know it is my misunderstanding, can anyone help me see the light?

Should be linked to Fx in what way? The equation you had up there looks correct to me. To total potential energy in the spring should the kinetic energy that was in the ball along with any potential energy from a gravitational force.

PEspring = 0.5*m*V^2 + m*g*x = 0.5*-k*x^2
 
qazxsw11111 said:
Take for example, a ball falling on a spring. Before touching the spring, the ball has velocity v. Then x metres of spring is compressed.

Total energy that is lost in the spring=1/2 mv2+mgx
OK. That's the energy stored in the spring when compressed to the max from the ball.

When the spring is compressed for x m, it has 1/2 (F) (x) J of energy, right?
Not sure what this is. What's F? Are you trying to calculate the work done? You could say that the energy stored = F_ave * x, where F_ave is the average force exerted by the spring.

Usually one expresses the energy stored in the spring in terms of the spring constant (which determines the force as a function of x) as well as x. Do you know that result?

Maybe you can rephrase your question.
 
Topher925 said:
This would be the total energy absorbed by the spring, not lost.



No, I don't think so. If you take away the 1/2 then that will be the relationship for work done on the spring. In other words,

Work = F x X

But work is not the same as energy, do you know the difference?



Combine which two equations? Ideally, you would find the average force by applying the mean value theorem on F = -kx. But since this is a simple and ideal problem you could just find the total change in force on the spring and divide by 2. Or,

Favg = (Ff-Fi)/2



Should be linked to Fx in what way? The equation you had up there looks correct to me. To total potential energy in the spring should the kinetic energy that was in the ball along with any potential energy from a gravitational force.

PEspring = 0.5*m*V^2 + m*g*x = 0.5*-k*x^2

Ahh yes. My mistake typo there. I think it is energy lost by the ball to the spring. But isn't the energy equation for a spring is 1/2 F x, where F is the average Force and x is the distance compressed? I thought by conservation of energy, PE+k.e lost by ball=1/2 Fx, which my teacher said that it should be PE+KE=Fx.

BTW, I am trying to find the average force and F is the force, Doc Al.
 
qazxsw11111 said:
But isn't the energy equation for a spring is 1/2 F x, where F is the average Force and x is the distance compressed?
No. Why would you need the 1/2? As I said earlier, the work done to compress the spring--and thus the energy stored in the spring--is F_ave * x.
I thought by conservation of energy, PE+k.e lost by ball=1/2 Fx, which my teacher said that it should be PE+KE=Fx.
Your teacher is correct.

In the case of a spring, the average force is one half of the maximum force, thus: F_ave = 1/2 kx. Combining this with the earlier equation gives you the energy stored in the spring: E = F_ave*x = (1/2 k x)*x = 1/2kx^2.
 
where does the formula 1/2 Fx come from - i need to find out where the half comes from for some coursework of mine :S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K