Confused about time dilain length contraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between time dilation and length contraction in the context of special relativity. The user expresses confusion over deriving the time dilation formula for a horizontal light clock without first accepting length contraction. They argue that both phenomena must be consistent to avoid a detector of absolute motion. The conclusion emphasizes that while time dilation and length contraction are interrelated, deriving one independently of the other presents a mathematical challenge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with light clocks and their operation
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz transformation equations
  • Basic grasp of the concept of simultaneity in different reference frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz transformation equations
  • Explore the implications of simultaneity in special relativity
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of light clocks
  • Investigate the relationship between time dilation and length contraction in various reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the interdependence of time dilation and length contraction.

teodorakis
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
hi, we all know when we derive the time dialtion formula we choose a vertical light clock, and basically since the light take a longer zig-zag path to the stationary observer, the time is dilated. That's ok but when deriving length contraction, firstly we accept time dilation for horizontal clock and then do some maths and derive the length contraction formula, so the horizontal clocks affected by both time dilation and length contraction, but what i want to ask is, does length contraction occurs as a result of time dilation?
I mean think of a vertical and a horizontal clock in a spaceship both in sync in that reference frame, now to an observer that has a speed v according to that ship these two clocks must dilate at the same rate by the postulate of relativity, they are not in sync though. Anyway i can understand they should all dely at the same rate, cause otherwise we have a detector of absolute motion, so no matter the choice of clock we use they should be all sync in an inertial reference frame(if we sync them of course). But when i want to mathematically want to derive the time dilaion in horizontal clock i have to accept the length contraction at first, i can't derive it alone, or like all of the sources did, time is dilated same rate as vertical clock adn from here derive thelegth contraction formula. I'm like in a vicious circle, can not derive one ithout other matheatically, please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In relativistic theory all physics laws are the same independent of the reference frame. When time dilates, so must length also change in order that the speed is preserved: speed = length / time.
 
let me clarify things, we don't need to know the machinery or principle of the other clocks, they have to delay asme rate as the vertical light clock, otherwisse the observer in the moving vehicle has a way of understanding that he is moving by using the mismatch in his clocks.
That's ok, but i am trying to derive the time dilation formula in the horizontal clock, just like we derive in vertical clcok, such that i only accept that the speed of light is constant for all observers, with just this assumption, i think we should be able to derive the time dilation alone, shouldn't we?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K