Confusion about how the momentum is transferred

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using non-pyrotechnic methods, such as a spring mechanism, to alter a satellite's velocity in space through momentum transfer. It explores the mechanics of a proposed system involving a spring-loaded mass that, when released, could theoretically reduce the satellite's speed. Participants note that while such a mechanism might create initial movement, conventional propulsion systems like rockets or compressed gas offer better thrust-to-mass ratios. The conversation also touches on the inter-satellite separation mechanism used by CanX 4/5, questioning whether the satellites would continue to drift apart after separation or remain stationary. Ultimately, the feasibility and practicality of the proposed ideas are challenged, emphasizing the need for more effective propulsion methods.
alditi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking of non pyrotechnic ways to make changes in the velocity of a satellite in space and my concepts here might be totally wrong, but i wondered if transfer of momentum might work.
That is, as in the first image if i have a small mass compressed by a spring and i release it later by some mechanism so it springs away from the satellite, will i succeed in reducing the speed of the satellite? i know i might affect the moment of inertia of the satellite but what could the effects be if i have magnetotorquers to stabilize my satellite.
My professor dismissed it after ten seconds of listening to it and didn't explain why.

also, I read about the inter satellite separation mechanism the canX 4/5 used and i might not have understood the working fully but this is what i think they have done to separate the satellite.
They used an electrical debonding epoxy sold as ElectRelease to hold two plungers (one whose tip is a cone and the other whose tip is a cup. When current is passed the bond breaks and the belleville springs decompress and pull the plungers away from each other till it hits against the base plate shown by aluminum. you'll notice in the last picture of the second image there's a millimeter gap between the plunger and the aluminum base; this is the mechanism when it is loaded with the epoxy. when it gets debonded the springs expand and the plunger jumps back. the aluminum base is connected to the satellite face by the four screws and the belleville springs and the plates shown in red (called push plates) all sit inside the satellite(the link: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/31620/1/Urbanek_Jakub_201111_MASc_thesis.pdf it's explained properly here)
my question is, in this mechanism, are the satellites going to move away from each other with however small a relative velocity? (taking a ideal case neglecting effects of drifts) or will the satellites just separate and stay there?
 

Attachments

  • Untitledtemp.png
    Untitledtemp.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 536
  • ISS.jpg
    ISS.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
will i succeed in reducing the speed of the satellite?
If you emit the ball in forward direction, yes. However, what is the advantage of this mechanical system? There are conventional systems which have a better thrust to mass ratio (rockets, or if the system should be really small just compressed gas), and if you have enough time an ion drive is even better.

If you separate two satellites with a "kick", they will continue to drift away. Their different orbits will change their relative movement within the timescale of the orbital period.
 
Thanks, you're right there are much more practical systems.
It's a small system and we were just discussing ideas. They wanted something original, something that hadn't been done before so i suggested this. and the prof made me feel the physics might be wrong.
In the ISS system i wasn't sure if this mechanism causes them to move away at all. the plunger is thrust inwards so i think if anything they should move towards each other...?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top