Confusion about Newton's laws, sum of forces equals zero

AI Thread Summary
Understanding when the sum of forces equals zero is crucial in solving Newton's laws problems. The confusion arises from mixing the forces acting on an object with the equal and opposite forces it exerts. When analyzing an object, only the forces applied to it should be considered, not the forces it applies back. For example, when pushing a car, the net force is determined by the applied force, friction, gravity, and the normal force, and it will equal zero only if the car is at rest or moving at a constant speed. Clarifying these concepts helps in accurately determining when the sum of forces is zero or not.
LogarithmLuke
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
I've lately began working with Newtons laws problems at school again, and I've already ran into a few problems.

When making calculations and solving problems, it is often nessecary to understand when forces are equal to zero, and when they are not. Since every force has an equal and opposite counter force, according to Newtons third law, it seems as though the sum of forces are always equal to zero, in both y and x directions.

The reason objects are still able to move though, the way i understand it, is because if let's say i push a book across the table, my mass is far greater than the books and therefore my acceleration will be negligible. So it makes sense to me that objects can move, but always using that the sum of forces equal zero when solving problems causes a lot of issues.

How do i know when the sum of forces in a direction equal zero, and when they do not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LogarithmLuke said:
How do i know when the sum of forces in a direction equal zero, and when they do not?
You are mixing together two separate issues. The forces you are summing are not the equal and opposite forces at every point, they are only one of each pair: only the forces applied to the object (not the forces the object applies back).
 
russ_watters said:
You are mixing together two separate issues. The forces you are summing are not the equal and opposite forces at every point, they are only one of each pair: only the forces applied to the object (not the forces the object applies back).

So let's say I am pushing a car, using a force. The car pushes back at me with a force that has the same magnitude, but the force is directed at me. Therefore the sum of forces on the car are the force i use to push, friction and gravity as well as the normal force. The net force on the car will be zero if it has no acceleration or travels at a constant pace, but it is not automatically zero. Is my thinking right?
 
LogarithmLuke said:
So let's say I am pushing a car, using a force. The car pushes back at me with a force that has the same magnitude, but the force is directed at me. Therefore the sum of forces on the car are the force i use to push, friction and gravity as well as the normal force. The net force on the car will be zero if it has no acceleration or travels at a constant pace, but it is not automatically zero. Is my thinking right?
Yep!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top