Confusion about preparing ensemble of particles and no-cloning theorem

kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2
To get a distribution of some dynamic variable of a wavefunction, we actually need to prepare an ensemble of particles, in which all the particles have the same wavefunction, right?
And no-cloning theorem states that it's impossible to copy an unknown quantum state.
So is this a contradiction?
I've figured that in order to prepare an ensemble we have to know the wavefunction, so it doesn't really fit the situation under which the no-cloning theorem applies. But I can't really give myself a clear and detailed reasoning to convince myself. Could you guys help me explain it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I was not specific enough, let's start with: what's the essential difference between preparing an ensemble and copying an unknown quantum state?
 
Emm...still no one, that's strange, is there something wrong about my question, or the way I asked?
 
I am not sure I understand the question. An ensemble is something with statistical properties, usually described via a density matrix. There is no reason to assume that all the individual systems in the ensemble have the same wavefunction (in fact, one usually assumes that this is NOT the case).
Making a measurement on an ensemble is usually equivalent to repeated measurements on a single system, i.e. the ergodic hypothesis.
 
f95toli said:
I am not sure I understand the question. An ensemble is something with statistical properties, usually described via a density matrix. There is no reason to assume that all the individual systems in the ensemble have the same wavefunction (in fact, one usually assumes that this is NOT the case).
Making a measurement on an ensemble is usually equivalent to repeated measurements on a single system, i.e. the ergodic hypothesis.
Well, seems I was under the false impression that all particles in an ensemble should have a same wavefunction, thanks for clarifying. But then I can't understand ensemble interpretation, I always thought to verify the Born's statistical interpretation, we need to prepare exactly the same wavefunctions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top