Confusion abt relation betwn time travel and speed of light

AI Thread Summary
Time travel theories suggest a relationship between speed and time, particularly emphasizing that anything traveling faster than light moves backward in time, while light itself, traveling at light speed, remains stationary in time. However, light does take time to travel due to the distinction between coordinate time and proper time in relativity. Proper time, which measures aging, does not advance for an object moving at light speed, meaning it appears to stand still in other frames of reference. In contrast, an object moving close to light speed experiences minimal proper time passage compared to the surrounding world, allowing for a form of time travel into the future. Thus, while light speed represents a limit where time does not advance, approaching this speed can enable significant time dilation effects.
aritro88
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i don't know in which section it belongs, so i am putting it here...

according to various theories proposed by various researchers, time travel depends on the speed of light. as far as i have read/heard -
i) anything traveling faster than the speed of light moves back in time.
ii) anything traveling AT the speed of light remains stationary in time.

now my question-
if light is traveling at the speed of light (obviously), then why does it take time to travel?

it (light beam/ray etc) should be stationary in time and should reach the destination the moment it leaves the light source.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The backwards "solutions" are mostly nonsense. There is some sense in which it is true under GR, but it's far more complicated than that. Let's stay in realm of Special Relativity and stick to speeds up to speed of light.

There are two concepts of time in relativity. There is time as a coordinate and there is proper time. You can think of proper time as aging of something. In other words, a clock you carry with you will measure your proper time. Also, the proper time and coordinate time agree for an object that's at rest in your chosen coordinate system.

When we talk about time slowing down for moving objects, we are comparing time in different coordinate systems. Another way to look at it is that we compare proper time measured by two different observers.

Now, if we happen to have a clock moving along with the beam of light, which will measure proper time for that beam of light, in any other frame of reference, that clock will appear to stand still. The proper time does not advance for a system that travels at the speed of light. Such a system does not age.

The connection to time travel is pretty straight forward. If you wanted to see what the world is like thousands of years from now, all you have to do is get up to very near the speed of light. In that case, your proper time advances very little while proper time of the world around you advances a lot. Light speed is just the extreme case, where time for traveler would not advance at all.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top