Confusion in Newton's 3rd law of motion

AI Thread Summary
Newton's 3rd law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, but these forces act on different bodies and do not create equilibrium. In the case of a book on a table, the book exerts a downward force due to gravity, while the table exerts an equal upward force, resulting in a net force of zero on the book, thus maintaining equilibrium. Similarly, the table is also in equilibrium as the forces acting on it balance out. The confusion arises from misunderstanding that action and reaction forces do not affect the motion of the individual bodies involved. Understanding that equilibrium is determined by the net forces acting on each object clarifies the concept.
Shafia Zahin
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
I'm having a lot of confusions in the 3rd law of motion.It says action and reaction forces do not create equilibrium as the forces act upon two different bodies.Okay,I understand that if I want to make a body move I'll have to count the net force that is acting upon it not the force that is being exerted by it on another body.I can understand it when I see the example of the horse and cart problem or the boat and passenger problem that the passenger exerts a force on the boat and that's why the boat move though the boat exerts an equal force to the passenger that doesn't make any effect on the boat's movement. But, I get confused when I see the example of a book resting on a table.If the book exerting a force on the table then the table should break or move because the table is also exerting an equal force on the book but the book is a different object.How can it create an equilibrium then?I mean, I can't match the two of the examples and getting more and more confused.
Please help me.
With regards,
Shafia.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shafia Zahin said:
But, I get confused when I see the example of a book resting on a table.If the book exerting a force on the table then the table should break or move because the table is also exerting an equal force on the book but the book is a different object.How can it create an equilibrium then?
The book is in equilibrium because the net force on it is zero: The force of gravity (the earth) pulling down is canceled by the force of the table pushing up.

The table is also in equilibrium: The force that the book exerts on the table plus the weight of the table is balanced by the upward force that the ground exerts on the table.

It's true that the force that the book exerts on the table is equal and opposite to the force that the table exerts on the book. But so what?
 
  • Like
Likes Shafia Zahin

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
I Newton's Third Law: Action & Reaction Along the Line Connecting Two Objects
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Newton's 3rd Law interactions with 2nd and 1st Law Partners
Replies
8
Views
2K
How Does Mass Influence the Reaction in Newton's 3rd Law of Motion?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Confused about Newton's 3rd law
Replies
22
Views
3K
Why a book on a table is not an example of Newton's 3rd law?
Replies
10
Views
4K
B Action-reaction of a sailing boat and wind
Replies
8
Views
1K
Empirical and Definitional Content of Newton's Laws
3
Replies
117
Views
9K
A question about Newton's laws & free body diagrams....
Replies
6
Views
2K
Newton's 3rd law & rocket propulsion (detailed explanation)
Replies
18
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top