Confusion regarding continuity equation in electrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The continuity equation in electrodynamics can be applied to a system of two charged particles with distinct charge densities and velocity fields. While the charge densities can be summed to obtain a local charge density, the corresponding velocities cannot be directly added due to their differing contributions to the current. Instead, a charge-weighted velocity must be defined to appropriately represent the system. The charge flux density vector, which combines charge density and velocity, can be superimposed for separate solutions. This distinction is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the continuity equation.
ppoonamk
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have two charged particles with charge densities ρ1(r,t) and ρ2 (r,t) with corresponding velocity fields V1(r,t) and V2(r,t). Can I write continuity equation for the combined system? Wouldn't charges moving with different velocities would contribute differently to the current which will violate the continuity equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The continuity equation is linear in the charge density-- that means the sum of any two solutions is also a solution.
 
Perhaps the key point to stress is that if two different charge distributions are associated with two different velocity distributions, you can add the charge densities to get the local charge density, but you don't add the velocities-- there is no local velocity, you'd have to define a charge-weighted velocity to be able to use it like an independent local quantity in the continuity equation. You can think in terms of the charge flux density vector, which is the product of the charge density and the velocity, and then that quantity can be superimposed if you have two separate solutions, but the velocities of the two separate components cannot be meaningfully added the way the charge densities can.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top