Confusion regarding jargon in journals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Griswold1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Journals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the meanings of the terms i775 and z850, which are identified as color filter names used in astrophysics for broad band photometry. Initially mistaken for consumer electronics model numbers, these filters correspond to infrared wavelengths of approximately 775nm and 850nm, respectively. They are part of the standard filters defined by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and utilized in Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding jargon in scientific literature, as well as the collaborative effort to clarify these terms. Overall, the thread emphasizes the learning process involved in interpreting specialized terminology in academic journals.
Griswold1982
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading a few journal entries on Arxiv.org, and one of the ones that continues to show up in astrophysics and astronomy journals is i775 and/or z850. There are several others, a few of which I have been able to find definitions for. Would anyone know what these mean, and for discussion purposes, are there any others that anyone has trouble with?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Griswold1982 said:
I've been reading a few journal entries on Arxiv.org, and one of the ones that continues to show up in astrophysics and astronomy journals is i775 and/or z850. There are several others, a few of which I have been able to find definitions for. Would anyone know what these mean, and for discussion purposes, are there any others that anyone has trouble with?


Griswold, could you possibly be kidding? I could be completely misinformed about this, but offhand I would identify i775 and Z850 as model numbers of consumer electronics.

How about this? If you came across those terms in some astrophysics/astronomy article in the arxiv, then give us an arxiv link to the article and tell us what page to look on. Then somebody can go check it out and interpret for you if they want.
 
They look like names of colour filters for imaging.
 
matt.o said:
They look like names of colour filters for imaging.

Good! Thanks Matt! I found something. Still trying to figure it out. I owe Griswold an apology! They do seem to be color filter names. Not sure so I'm still checking.
=============================

Got something
http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/zdrop/images.html

This shows samples of the same stars seen thru a z-band filter and an i-band filter. They seem to be in the infrared.
It says a typical wavelength for the i-band is around 0.8 micron and for the z-band it's around 0.9 micron.

Well d'uh! My immediate reaction was completely wrong. Learned something new, thanks to you both: Griswold and Matt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They are standard broad band photometry filters defined by the sloan digital sky survey and used on the Hubble ACS , it's an extrention of the UBVR film photometry bands.
i775 stands for infrared (in film terms) at 775nm
z850 stands for - so far out into the infrared we have run out of letters - at 850nm
 
Awesome guys, thanks a bunch. Here is the link.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0809/0809.1648v1.pdf.

They were able to rule out microlensing and any known supernova based on the limited spectrographic data they were able to obtain. The strange thing about the whole thing was the light curve was pretty symetrical, and the spectrum was almost featureless. That, and there is nothing really there, it was most likely extragalactic, but the only thing in that region is a very distant galaxy cluster.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top