Confussion about Del operator for field point vs source point.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the application of the nabla operator in electrodynamics, specifically its differentiation with respect to source points versus field points. The nabla operator, as used in multivariable calculus, represents spatial derivatives of scalar or vector fields, which are inherently spatially dependent. The distinction between source and field points is not clearly understood, as both types of derivatives yield values that depend on their respective points in space. The integrand in the integral for potential phi is noted to be a function of two variables, r and r', with the nabla operator acting on each independently. Clarification on this topic is sought to better understand the implications of these derivatives in electrodynamics.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
I electrodynamics, I've seen \nabla ' and \nabla where first is spatial derivative respect to source point and later spatial derivative respect to field point.

I am confuse. According to multi-variables calculus, the \nabla operator is spatial derivative of either a scalar or a vector field. Both of which are point form...which is absolutely spatial dependent only. I don't see what is the meaning respect to source or field points.

For example:

\nabla V is the gradient of a scalar function V, and it has a different value at each individual point specified. So is \nabla \cdot \vec E which is the divergence at a point in the space. These are regardless of whether it is a field or a source point.

I am confused. Please explain to me.

Thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integrand in the integral for phi is a function f(r,r') of two variables, r and r'.
Del acts on r, and Del' acts on r'.
 
Thanks

Alan
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top