MHB Is (p-1)C(a) congruent to (-1)^a mod(p)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the binomial coefficient (p-1)C(a) is congruent to (-1)^a mod(p) for a prime p and integer a between 1 and p-1. It utilizes Wilson's theorem, which states that (p-1)! is congruent to -1 mod p. The proof involves manipulating the binomial coefficient's formula and applying modular arithmetic to derive the congruence. Induction is suggested as a method to solidify the argument. The conclusion emphasizes the relationship between binomial coefficients and modular arithmetic in the context of prime numbers.
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Let p be prime and a be between 1 and p-1. Show the binomial coefficent (p-1)C(a) satifies

(p-1)C(a) =(-1)^a mod(p).

(p-1)C(a) =$\frac{(p-1)!}{a!(p-1-a)!}$ so we can apply wilson's theorem which says
(p-1)!=-1 (modp)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: congruence equation

Poirot said:
Let p be prime and a be between 1 and p-1. Show the binomial coefficent (p-1)C(a) satifies

(p-1)C(a) =(-1)^a mod(p).

(p-1)C(a) =$\frac{(p-1)!}{a!(p-1-a)!}$ so we can apply wilson's theorem which says
(p-1)!=-1 (modp)
Let $x\binom{p-1}{a+1}\equiv \binom{p-1}{a}\pmod{p}$.

Then we have $\frac{x(p-1)!}{(p-a-2)!(a+1)!}\equiv \frac{(p-1)!}{(p-a-1)!a!}\pmod{p}$.

Cancel things out (why can that be done?), you get $x\equiv -1\pmod{p}$

Now apply induction.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top