Conjugate Bra Ket Properties for Proving the Schwarz Inequality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the properties of conjugate bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically in relation to proving the Schwarz inequality for the expression $$. Key confirmations include that $ = ^*$ and $ = ^*$ when $H$ is Hermitian. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding Hermitian conjugates and their properties, which are crucial for manipulating these expressions correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of complex conjugates and their application in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of the Schwarz inequality in the context of inner products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the Schwarz inequality in quantum states
  • Explore the derivation of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality using bra-ket notation
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum mechanics related to inner product spaces
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of bra-ket notation and its applications in proving inequalities.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Just checking (while trying to prove the Schwarz inequality for $<f|H|g>$, I know $ <f|g>=<g|f>^* $ please confirm/correct :

If $ \psi=f+\lambda g, \:then\: \psi^*=f^*+\lambda^* g^* $

Is $ <f^*|g>=<g^*|f>^* $ and $ <f^*|H|g>=<g^*|H|f>^* $ (H hermitian)?

Is $ <f^*|H|g><g^*|H|f> = - <g^*|H|f><f^*|H|g> $

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ognik said:
Just checking (while trying to prove the Schwarz inequality for $<f|H|g>$,

Use the $\LaTeX$ codes
Code:
\langle and \rangle
instead of < and > to get better-looking symbols.

I know $ <f|g>=<g|f>^* $ please confirm/correct :

If $ \psi=f+\lambda g, \:\text{then}\: \psi^*=f^*+\lambda^* g^* $

Is $ <f^*|g>=<g^*|f>^* $ and $ <f^*|H|g>=<g^*|H|f>^* $ (H hermitian)?

It's confusing to put the conjugate symbol inside a bra or ket. That's not usually how we do this notation. Remember these rules:
1. The Hermitian conjugate of a bra is the corresponding ket, and vice versa. That is, $|f\rangle^{\dagger}=\langle f|$, and $\langle f|^{\dagger}=|f\rangle$.
2. The Hermitian conjugate of a complex number is its complex conjugate.
3. The Hermitian conjugate of a Hermitian conjugate is the original thing back at you.
4. For a general operator $A$, you have $\langle f|A|g\rangle^*=\langle g|A^{\dagger}|f\rangle$.

So, I would say you have $\langle f|g\rangle^*=\langle g|f\rangle$, and $\langle f|H|g\rangle^*=\langle g|H|f\rangle$, since $H$ is Hermitian.

Is $ <f^*|H|g><g^*|H|f> = - <g^*|H|f><f^*|H|g> $

Thanks

I would say $\langle f|H|g\rangle \, \langle g|H|f\rangle=\langle f|H|g\rangle \langle f|H|g\rangle^*=|\langle f|H|g\rangle|^2$.
 
It's confusing to put the conjugate symbol inside a bra or ket.
Which was what I needed to know to figure out the (too embarrassing to tell) mistake I was making.

The proof fell into place almost too easily after that, thanks ackbach
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
946
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
976
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K