Conjugate momentum in the hamiltonian

moobox
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I just have a quick question that I haven't quite been able to find a definitive answer to, regarding conjugate momenta in the Hamiltonian.

Ok, so it regards the following term for the hamiltonian in a magnetic field:

H=\frac{1}{2m}(p-qA)^2

I'd like to ask whether p is the conjugate momentum or if p_c=p-qA is the conjugate momentum. As a guess, I would say that p_c=p-qA is the conjugate momentum, as it seems to me that the hamiltonian should take into account the magnetic field. Would this then mean that the hamiltonian could be written as H=\frac{1}{2m}(p_c)^2

Also, very important, does -i\hbar\nabla represent the canonical momentum operator or the classical/mechanical momentum operatpor?

Im sure the answers are around somewhere on the internet, but it strikes me that there are some conflicting statements and a tendency to just go "oh yeah, now we swap the canonical momentum, p for mechanical momentum p" and the like, so it would be nice to get a definitive answer.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p is the conjugate/canonical momentum. p-eA is the mechanical momentum.
 
Ah, brilliant! Thanks for your quick response!

So that would make i\hbar\nabla the conjugate/canonical momentum operator?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top